These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24803754)
1. Comparison of I-gel with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia without paralysis: A prospective randomized study. Kini G; Devanna GM; Mukkapati KR; Chaudhuri S; Thomas D J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 24803754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: I-gel Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Following Digital Insertion in Nonparalyzed Anesthetized Patients. Luthra A; Chauhan R; Jain A; Bhukal I; Mahajan S; Bala I Anesth Essays Res; 2019; 13(4):669-675. PubMed ID: 32009713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Brimacombe J; Keller C; Fullekrug B; Agrò F; Rosenblatt W; Dierdorf SF; Garcia de Lucas E; Capdevilla X; Brimacombe N Anesthesiology; 2002 Feb; 96(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 11818758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA proseal. Chauhan G; Nayar P; Seth A; Gupta K; Panwar M; Agrawal N J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Jan; 29(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 23493414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Pneumoperitoneum and Lateral Position on Oropharyngeal Seal Pressures of Proseal LMA in Laparoscopic Urological Procedures. Rustagi P; Patkar GA; Ourasang AK; Tendolkar BA J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Feb; 11(2):UC05-UC09. PubMed ID: 28384963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Brimacombe J; Keller C Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Baska Mask Versus Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Elective Surgeries Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jose J; Kagalkar ND; Kattimani MM; Suntan A Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37366. PubMed ID: 37182077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of Proseal laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube suction in elective non-laparoscopic surgeries of up to ninety minutes duration: A prospective, randomized study. Verma S; Sharma SP J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2018; 34(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 29643624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fiberoptic findings. Fukuhara A; Okutani R; Oda Y J Anesth; 2013 Feb; 27(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22965330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Air-Q Blocker in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gupta R; Mahajan R; Jatinder M; Gulati S; Mehta A; Nazir R J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2019; 35(3):340-347. PubMed ID: 31543582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Anand LK; Goel N; Singh M; Kapoor D Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective study to evaluate and compare laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and i-gel airway in the prone position. Taxak S; Gopinath A; Saini S; Bansal T; Ahlawat MS; Bala M Saudi J Anaesth; 2015; 9(4):446-50. PubMed ID: 26543466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison and evaluation of single-use LMA supreme versus the reusable proseal LMA in paralyzed patients undergoing surgery with controlled ventilation. Sood S; Chahar S; Thakur A; Gupta M; Saxena A; Subramanian S J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2020; 36(4):494-499. PubMed ID: 33840930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenberg position on oropharyngeal sealing pressure of I-gel™ and ProSeal LMA™ in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Mishra SK; Sivaraman B; Balachander H; Naggappa M; Parida S; Bhat RR; Yuvaraj K Anesth Essays Res; 2015; 9(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 26712973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standard Laryngeal Mask Airway and LMA-ProSeal during laparoscopic surgery. Natalini G; Lanza G; Rosano A; Dell'Agnolo P; Bernardini A J Clin Anesth; 2003 Sep; 15(6):428-32. PubMed ID: 14652119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal(TM) as a temporary ventilatory device in grossly and morbidly obese patients before laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation. Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Brimacombe L Anesth Analg; 2002 Mar; 94(3):737-40; table of contents. PubMed ID: 11867408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial. Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective Comparison of Insertion Characteristics of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) ProSeal® Using Rotation Techniques vs Standard Techniques in Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery. Khutell A; Grover T; Singh A; Seth A; Madan M; Yadav K Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37976. PubMed ID: 37223173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal™ in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation. Saran S; Mishra SK; Badhe AS; Vasudevan A; Elakkumanan LB; Mishra G J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):195-8. PubMed ID: 24803756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis. Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]