These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24805806)
1. Evaluation of the marginal fit at implant-abutment interface by optical coherence tomography. Kikuchi K; Akiba N; Sadr A; Sumi Y; Tagami J; Minakuchi S J Biomed Opt; 2014 May; 19(5):055002. PubMed ID: 24805806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal accuracy of three implant-ceramic abutment configurations. Baldassarri M; Hjerppe J; Romeo D; Fickl S; Thompson VP; Stappert CF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 22616046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of fit accuracy between Procera custom abutments and three implant systems. Alves da Cunha Tde M; Correia de Araújo RP; Barbosa da Rocha PV; Pazos Amoedo RM Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):772-7. PubMed ID: 20977612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiographical evaluation of the gap at the implant-abutment interface. Papavassiliou H; Kourtis S; Katerelou J; Chronopoulos V J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Aug; 22(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 20690952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values. Smith NA; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):561-7. PubMed ID: 24656409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vertical Misfit of Single-Implant Abutments Made from Different Materials Under Cyclic Loading. Butignon LE; de Almeida Basílio M; Santo JS; Arioli Filho JN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 27632255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fit accuracy between Procera® custom abutments and three implant systems. de Morais Alves da Cunha T; de Araújo RP; da Rocha PV; Amoedo RM Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 14(6):890-5. PubMed ID: 21176100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of 4 intraoral radiographic techniques for misfit detection at the implant abutment joint. Darós P; Carneiro VC; Siqueira AP; de-Azevedo-Vaz SL J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 29150129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features. Aktas G; Özcan N; Aydin DH; Şahin E; Akça K J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 24360015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments. Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of acrylic bridges using optical coherence tomography. Al-Imam H; Michou S; Benetti AR; Gotfredsen K J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Mar; 46(3):274-281. PubMed ID: 30387868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap. Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments. Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. Hermann JS; Schoolfield JD; Schenk RK; Buser D; Cochran DL J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1372-83. PubMed ID: 11699479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observation and determination of periodontal tissue profile using optical coherence tomography. Kakizaki S; Aoki A; Tsubokawa M; Lin T; Mizutani K; Koshy G; Sadr A; Oda S; Sumi Y; Izumi Y J Periodontal Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):188-199. PubMed ID: 29063599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of a new implant abutment design on peri-implant soft tissues. Chien HH; Schroering RL; Prasad HS; Tatakis DN J Oral Implantol; 2014 Oct; 40(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 23339331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Implant Connection Type and Depth on the Seating Accuracy of Hand-Tightened Abutments. Siadat H; Belbasi S; Alikhasi M; Nazari V; Beyabanaki E J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e661-e665. PubMed ID: 29239053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-Invasive Periodontal Probing Through Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Mota CC; Fernandes LO; Cimões R; Gomes AS J Periodontol; 2015 Sep; 86(9):1087-94. PubMed ID: 25879790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study. Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal fit and microbial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of fixed partial prostheses: An in vitro analysis using Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. Nascimento Cd; Ikeda LN; Pita MS; Pedroso e Silva RC; Pedrazzi V; Albuquerque RF; Ribeiro RF J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Dec; 114(6):831-8. PubMed ID: 26359546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]