These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24805890)

  • 1. User ratings of prosthetic usability and satisfaction in VA study to optimize DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Borgia M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 24805890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. User and clinician perspectives on DEKA arm: results of VA study to optimize DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 24805891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The DEKA Arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):492-504. PubMed ID: 24150930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Latlief G; Klinger SL; Sasson N; Walters LS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):456-66. PubMed ID: 24286806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-reported and performance-based outcomes using DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Latlief G; Sasson N; Smurr-Walters L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 25019659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptions of satisfaction, usability and desirability of the DEKA Arm before and after a trial of home use.
    Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Acluche F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178640. PubMed ID: 28575025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EMG Pattern Recognition Control of the DEKA Arm: Impact on User Ratings of Satisfaction and Usability.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M; Latlief G; Phillips S
    IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2019; 7():2100113. PubMed ID: 30680253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attrition and retention in upper limb prosthetics research: experience of the VA home study of the DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):816-821. PubMed ID: 28098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of retention and attrition in a study of an advanced upper limb prosthesis: implications for adoption of the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Cancio J; Klinger S; Latlief G; Sasson N; Smurr-Walters L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):206-210. PubMed ID: 28375687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of the DEKA Arm for amputees with brachial plexus injury: A case series.
    Resnik L; Fantini C; Latlief G; Phillips S; Sasson N; Sepulveda E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178642. PubMed ID: 28628623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a new, above-elbow, body-powered prosthetic arm: a final report.
    Cupo ME; Sheredos SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Oct; 35(4):431-46. PubMed ID: 10220222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. User experience of controlling the DEKA Arm with EMG pattern recognition.
    Resnik LJ; Acluche F; Lieberman Klinger S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203987. PubMed ID: 30240420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using virtual reality environment to facilitate training with advanced upper-limb prosthesis.
    Resnik L; Etter K; Klinger SL; Kambe C
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2011; 48(6):707-18. PubMed ID: 21938657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the QuickDASH in Patients With Upper Limb Amputation.
    Resnik L; Borgia M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Sep; 96(9):1676-83. PubMed ID: 25912667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guest editorial: Department of Veterans Affairs Amputations System of care:5 years of accomplishments and outcomes.
    Webster JB; Poorman CE; Cifu DX
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(4):vii-xvi. PubMed ID: 25144180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of Veterans with upper limb amputation.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Heinemann AW; Clark MA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Apr; 44(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 31960734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A National Survey of Prosthesis Use in Veterans with Major Upper Limb Amputation: Comparisons by Gender.
    Resnik LJ; Borgia ML; Clark MA
    PM R; 2020 Nov; 12(11):1086-1098. PubMed ID: 32103626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and testing of new upper-limb prosthetic devices: research designs for usability testing.
    Resnik L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2011; 48(6):697-706. PubMed ID: 21938656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Movement quality of conventional prostheses and the DEKA Arm during everyday tasks.
    Cowley J; Resnik L; Wilken J; Smurr Walters L; Gates D
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Feb; 41(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 26932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.