These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
29. Are high doses of intracoronary adenosine an alternative to standard intravenous adenosine for the assessment of fractional flow reserve? Casella G; Leibig M; Schiele TM; Schrepf R; Seelig V; Stempfle HU; Erdin P; Rieber J; König A; Siebert U; Klauss V Am Heart J; 2004 Oct; 148(4):590-5. PubMed ID: 15459587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rationale of combined intracoronary pressure and flow velocity measurements. Meuwissen M; Siebes M; Spaan JA; Piek JJ Z Kardiol; 2002; 91 Suppl 3():108-12. PubMed ID: 12641024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A novel flow-based parameter of collateral function assessed by intracoronary thermodilution. Lindner M; Felix SB; Empen K; Reffelmann T J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):148-53. PubMed ID: 24717270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Alterations of pressure waveforms along the coronary arteries and the effect of microcirculatory vasodilation. Vavuranakis M; Stamatopoulos I; Papaioannou TG; Nikolopoulos S; Toutouzas K; Stefanadis C Int J Cardiol; 2007 Apr; 117(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 16945435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity for hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenoses. Meuwissen M; Siebes M; Chamuleau SA; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2003 Sep; 1(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 15030274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve. Ng MK; Yeung AC; Fearon WF Circulation; 2006 May; 113(17):2054-61. PubMed ID: 16636168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pressure-derived measurement of coronary flow reserve. MacCarthy P; Berger A; Manoharan G; Bartunek J; Barbato E; Wijns W; Heyndrickx GR; Pijls NH; De Bruyne B J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jan; 45(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 15653018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantitative assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with and without epicardial atherosclerosis. Melikian N; Vercauteren S; Fearon WF; Cuisset T; MacCarthy PA; Davidavicius G; Aarnoudse W; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; Wijns W; Heyndrickx GR; Pijls NH; de Bruyne B EuroIntervention; 2010 Apr; 5(8):939-45. PubMed ID: 20542779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of efficacy and safety of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside and intravenous adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve. Rudzinski W; Waller AH; Rusovici A; Dehnee A; Nasur A; Benz M; Sanchez S; Klapholz M; Kaluski E Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):540-4. PubMed ID: 22961876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of percutaneous coronary intervention on coronary microvascular resistance index. Verhoeff BJ; Siebes M; Meuwissen M; Atasever B; Voskuil M; de Winter RJ; Koch KT; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ Circulation; 2005 Jan; 111(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 15611371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Calculation of the index of microcirculatory resistance without coronary wedge pressure measurement in the presence of epicardial stenosis. Yong AS; Layland J; Fearon WF; Ho M; Shah MG; Daniels D; Whitbourn R; Macisaac A; Kritharides L; Wilson A; Ng MK JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jan; 6(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 23347861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]