These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24806978)

  • 1. Fetal scalp blood sampling in labor--a review.
    Jørgensen JS; Weber T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):548-55. PubMed ID: 24806978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal scalp blood sampling during labor: an appraisal of the physiological basis and scientific evidence.
    Chandraharan E; Wiberg N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):544-7. PubMed ID: 24806702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal scalp blood sampling should be abandoned: AGAINST: Fetal scalp blood sampling in conjunction with electronic fetal monitoring reduces the risk of unnecessary operative delivery.
    Stener Jørgensen J
    BJOG; 2016 Oct; 123(11):1771. PubMed ID: 27653326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of non-reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management.
    Rhöse S; Heinis AM; Vandenbussche F; van Drongelen J; van Dillen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 24597920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace.
    East CE; Leader LR; Sheehan P; Henshall NE; Colditz PB
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Mar; (3):CD006174. PubMed ID: 20238343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: AGAINST: fetal scalp blood sampling in conjunction with electronic fetal monitoring reduces the risk of unnecessary operative delivery.
    Saeed F
    BJOG; 2017 Aug; 124(9):1452-1453. PubMed ID: 28727309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Foetal scalp blood sampling: impact on the incidence of Caesarean section and assisted vaginal deliveries for non-reassuring foetal heart rate and its use according to gestational age].
    Reif P; Haas J; Schöll W; Lang U
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2011 Oct; 215(5):194-8. PubMed ID: 22028059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Author's reply re: AGAINST: fetal scalp blood sampling in conjunction with electronic fetal monitoring reduces the risk of unnecessary operative delivery.
    Jørgensen JS
    BJOG; 2017 Aug; 124(9):1453-1454. PubMed ID: 28727310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Follow-up national survey (Sweden) of routines for intrapartum fetal surveillance.
    Holzmann M; Nordström L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):712-4. PubMed ID: 20102293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining the fetal scalp lactate level that indicates the need for intervention in labour.
    Allen RM; Bowling FG; Oats JJ
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 15598295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experience of fetal scalp blood sampling during labor.
    Liljeström L; Wikström AK; Skalkidou A; Akerud H; Jonsson M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jan; 93(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 24116986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ST analysis of fetal electrocardiography in labor.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Maršál K
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Feb; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 21115414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ; Cahill AG
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta-analyses.
    Olofsson P; Ayres-de-Campos D; Kessler J; Tendal B; Yli BM; Devoe L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jun; 93(6):571-86; discussion 587-8. PubMed ID: 24797318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A French randomized controlled trial of ST-segment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor.
    Vayssière C; David E; Meyer N; Haberstich R; Sebahoun V; Roth E; Favre R; Nisand I; Langer B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):299.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17826428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns: a randomized controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry.
    Kühnert M; Schmidt S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1989-95. PubMed ID: 15592281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal scalp blood sampling.
    Udall KS; Larkin R
    J Fam Pract; 1982 Dec; 15(6):1157-9. PubMed ID: 7142934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Blix E; Brurberg KG; Reierth E; Reinar LM; Øian P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Jan; 95(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 26610052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neonatal outcome and delivery mode in labors with repetitive fetal scalp blood sampling.
    Holzmann M; Wretler S; Cnattingius S; Nordström L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Jan; 184():97-102. PubMed ID: 25483990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.