139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24807062)
1. An update on postrefractive surgery intraocular pressure determination.
Yao WJ; Crossan AS
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 25(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 24807062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [What to do if the intraocular pressure measurement does not appear reliable].
Hamard P
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2010 Apr; 33(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 20347507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element simulation of Goldmann tonometry after refractive surgery.
Asejczyk-Widlicka M; Srodka W
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():24-28. PubMed ID: 31677547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties, refractive error, and ocular pulse amplitude.
Erickson DH; Goodwin D; Rollins M; Belaustegui A; Anderson C
Optometry; 2009 Apr; 80(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 19329059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy.
Mamas N; Fuest M; Koutsonas A; Roessler G; Mazinani BE; Walter P; Plange N
J Glaucoma; 2016 Aug; 25(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 26950584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.
Pepose JS; Feigenbaum SK; Qazi MA; Sanderson JP; Roberts CJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 17188041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann tonometer, I-care pro, Tonopen XL, and Schiotz tonometer in patients after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
Ohana O; Varssano D; Shemesh G
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 65(7):579-583. PubMed ID: 28724814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring intraocular pressure.
Okafor KC; Brandt JD
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 26(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 25594767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Trabeculectomy and the Impact on Intraocular Pressure Measurement.
Pillunat KR; Spoerl E; Terai N; Pillunat LE
J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):278-282. PubMed ID: 27977478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: rebound versus goldmann applanation tonometry.
Fuest M; Mamas N; Walter P; Plange N
Curr Eye Res; 2014 Sep; 39(9):902-7. PubMed ID: 24588266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK.
Wang X; Shen J; McCulley JP; Bowman RW; Petroll WM; Cavanagh HD
CLAO J; 2002 Jul; 28(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 12144232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
