These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24807062)

  • 21. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
    Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea.
    Smedowski A; Weglarz B; Tarnawska D; Kaarniranta K; Wylegala E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Feb; 55(2):666-73. PubMed ID: 24425850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Chou CY; Jordan CA; McGhee CN; Patel DV
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in corneal thickness and curvature after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their impact on intraocular pressure measurements.
    Svedberg H; Chen E; Hamberg-Nyström H
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 243(12):1218-20. PubMed ID: 16003513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: A comparative study.
    Achiron A; Blumenfeld O; Avizemer H; Karmona L; Leybowich G; Man V; Bartov E; Burgansky-Eliash Z
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2016 Dec; 39(10):822-828. PubMed ID: 27871779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rebound tonometry versus Goldmann tonometry in school children: feasibility and agreement of intraocular pressure measurements.
    Esporcatte BL; Lopes FS; Fonseca Netto C; Rebouças-Santos V; Dias DT; Marujo FI; Rolim-de-Moura C
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2015; 78(6):359-62. PubMed ID: 26677038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dynamic contour tonometry: a new way to assess intraocular pressure in ectatic corneas.
    Ozbek Z; Cohen EJ; Hammersmith KM; Rapuano CJ
    Cornea; 2006 Sep; 25(8):890-4. PubMed ID: 17102662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour, Canon TX-10 non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects.
    Pelit A; Altan-Yaycioglu R; Pelit A; Akova YA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Jan; 92(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 18637107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera for evaluation of corneal deformation response and its impact on IOP measurement.
    Leung CK; Ye C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Apr; 54(4):2885-92. PubMed ID: 23482466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New ways to measure intraocular pressure.
    ElMallah MK; Asrani SG
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 19(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 18301285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Importance of accurately assessing biomechanics of the cornea.
    Roberts CJ
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 27152485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
    Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Icare rebound tonometry in children with known and suspected glaucoma.
    Flemmons MS; Hsiao YC; Dzau J; Asrani S; Jones S; Freedman SF
    J AAPOS; 2011 Apr; 15(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 21419676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of dehydration and fasting on intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Uysal BS; Duru N; Ozen U; Arikan Yorgun M; Akcay E; Caglayan M; Cagil N
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):451-457. PubMed ID: 28255839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Kandarakis A; Soumplis V; Pitsas C; Kandarakis S; Halikias J; Karagiannis D
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 45(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 20847755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tonometry after Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus.
    Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernandez C; Cuiña-Sardiña R; Benitez-Del-Castillo JM; Garcia-Feijoo J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):986-992. PubMed ID: 28858044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Scleral Tono-Pen Intraocular Pressure Measurements with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry.
    Badakere SV; Choudhari NS; Rao HL; Chary CR; Garudadri CS; Senthil S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 29370020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
    Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
    Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.