173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24807736)
1. Predictors of positive surgical margins and their location in Korean men undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Choo MS; Cho SY; Jeong CW; Lee SB; Ku JH; Hong SK; Byun SS; Kwak C; Kim HH; Lee SE; Jeong H
Int J Urol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):894-8. PubMed ID: 24807736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.
Dev HS; Wiklund P; Patel V; Parashar D; Palmer K; Nyberg T; Skarecky D; Neal DE; Ahlering T; Sooriakumaran P
Urol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(3):109.e7-13. PubMed ID: 25512161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group).
Sasaki T; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Kawase M; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koie T; Koga F; Urakami S; Inoue T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2023 Apr; 53(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 36708227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.
Yu YD; Lee M; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee S
J Endourol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 29212368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of surgical margin status and location after radical prostatectomy using positive biopsy sites on 12-core standard prostate biopsy.
Jeong H; Choo MS; Cho MC; Son H; Yoo S
Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4066. PubMed ID: 35260742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Yang R; Cao K; Han T; Zhang YF; Zhang GT; Xu LF; Lian HB; Li XG; Guo HQ
Asian J Androl; 2017; 19(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 27004537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's series in Japan.
Hashimoto T; Yoshioka K; Gondo T; Takeuchi H; Nakagami Y; Nakashima J; Tachibana M
Int J Urol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):873-8. PubMed ID: 23418870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report.
Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ficarra V; Novara G; Secco S; D'Elia C; Boscolo-Berto R; Gardiman M; Cavalleri S; Artibani W
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2682-8. PubMed ID: 19836778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating Incidence, Location, and Predictors of Positive Surgical Margin Among Chinese Men Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Qu W; Yu S; Tao J; Dong B; Fan Y; Du H; Deng H; Liu J; Zhang X
Cancer Control; 2021; 28():10732748211055265. PubMed ID: 34794321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive factors for short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.
Kanehira M; Takata R; Ishii S; Ito A; Ikarashi D; Matsuura T; Kato Y; Obara W
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Sep; 24(9):1099-1104. PubMed ID: 30972506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors Affecting Surgical Margin Positivity after Radical Prostatectomy in the Turkish Population: A Multicenter Study of the Urooncology Association.
Çelik S; Aslan G; Sözen S; Özen H; Akdoğan B; Baltaci S; İzol V; Tansuğ Z; Türkeri L;
Urol Int; 2020; 104(9-10):724-730. PubMed ID: 32353851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Obese men undergoing radical prostatectomy: Is robotic or retropubic better to limit positive surgical margins? Results from SEARCH.
Nik-Ahd F; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Klaassen Z; Cooperberg MR; Amling CL; Kane CJ; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):851-857. PubMed ID: 32681540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence and location of positive surgical margin among open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: a single institutional analysis.
Koizumi A; Narita S; Nara T; Takayama K; Kanda S; Numakura K; Tsuruta H; Maeno A; Huang M; Saito M; Inoue T; Tsuchiya N; Satoh S; Nanjo H; Habuchi T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2018 Aug; 48(8):765-770. PubMed ID: 29931077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
