165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24809539)
1. Seven-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer restorations in noncarious cervical lesions.
Fagundes TC; Barata TJ; Bresciani E; Santiago S; Franco EB; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(6):578-87. PubMed ID: 24809539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-year clinical evaluation of resinous restorative systems in non-carious cervical lesions.
Santiago SL; Passos VF; Vieira AH; Navarro MF; Lauris JR; Franco EB
Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 21203706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noncarious cervical lesions restored with three different tooth-colored materials: two-year results.
Stojanac IL; Premovic MT; Ramic BD; Drobac MR; Stojsin IM; Petrovic LM
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 22856681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-year prospective clinical performance of a one-step self-etch adhesive and a nanofiller hybrid resin composite in Class V lesions.
Preussker S; Pöschmann M; Kensche A; Natusch I; Koch R; Klimm W; Hannig C
Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 25000664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
Namgung C; Rho YJ; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Saraceni SH; Ciaramicoli MT; Kiyan VH
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system.
Gurgan S; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E; Oztas SS; Cakir FY
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 25299703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 36-month evaluation of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions.
Loguercio AD; Bittencourt DD; Baratieri LN; Reis A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Apr; 138(4):507-14; quiz 535-7. PubMed ID: 17403742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Effectiveness of a Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and a Mild One-step Self-etch Adhesive Applied Actively and Passively in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: An 18-Month Clinical Trial.
Jassal M; Mittal S; Tewari S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):581-592. PubMed ID: 29782222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
