166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24809539)
21. 10 year comparison of glass ionomer and composite resin restoration materials in class 1 and 2 cavities.
Hutchison C; Cave V
Evid Based Dent; 2019 Dec; 20(4):113-114. PubMed ID: 31863046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. 3-year clinical effectiveness of one-step adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.
Moretto SG; Russo EM; Carvalho RC; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Cardoso MV
J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 23747824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.
Hatirli H; Yasa B; Çelik EU
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5493-5503. PubMed ID: 33683465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Four-year randomized clinical trial of oxalic acid pretreatment in restorations of non-carious cervical lesions.
Albuquerque NL; de Souza AM; de Moraes MD; Mendonça JS; Rodrigues LK; Santiago SL
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 26174079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
Popoff DA; Santa Rosa TT; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; Moreira AN; Mjör IA
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical Performance of Composite Restorations with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Lining in Root Surface Carious Lesions.
Koc Vural U; Gökalp S; Kiremitci A
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 26794189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical effectiveness of a hydrophobic coating used in conjunction with a one-step self-etch adhesive: an 18-month evaluation.
Sartori N; Peruchi LD; Guimarães JC; Silva SB; Monteiro S; Baratieri LN; Belli R
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 23092143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Randomized, Controlled, Split-mouth Trial Evaluating the Clinical Performance of High-viscosity Glass-ionomer Restorations in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: Two-year Results.
Çelik EU; Tunac AT; Yilmaz F
J Adhes Dent; 2018; 20(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 30206572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems in noncarious cervical lesions: a two-year report.
Burgess JO; Sadid-Zadeh R; Cakir D; Ramp LC
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(5):477-87. PubMed ID: 23327229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
Brackett WW; Gilpatrick RO; Browning WD; Gregory PN
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10337292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical evaluation of flowable resins in non-carious cervical lesions: two-year results.
Celik C; Ozgünaltay G; Attar N
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 17695602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial.
Koc Vural U; Kerimova L; Kiremitci A
Odontology; 2021 Apr; 109(2):376-384. PubMed ID: 32902766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical comparison of bur- and laser-prepared minimally invasive occlusal resin composite restorations: two-year follow-up.
Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 20945740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
