These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24809539)

  • 41. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
    Busato AL; Loguercio AD; Reis A; Carrilho MR
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
    Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
    Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Three-year clinical evaluation of a silorane composite resin.
    Walter R; Boushell LW; Heymann HO; Ritter AV; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Chung Y; Swift EJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 24344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities.
    Gurgan S; Kutuk ZB; Yalcin Cakir F; Ergin E
    J Dent; 2020 Mar; 94():103175. PubMed ID: 31351909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV; Blaser PK; Watson RE; Mjör IA; McEdward DL; Sensi LG; Riley JL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
    Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Clinical evaluation of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive and a one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesion].
    Tian FC; Wang XY; Gao XJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Feb; 46(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 24535349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A; Alpaslan T; Gurgan S
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. One-year evaluation of a simplified ethanol-wet bonding technique: a randomized clinical trial.
    Araújo JF; Barros TA; Braga EM; Loretto SC; Silva e Souza Pde A; Silva e Souza MH
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 23969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical performance of ormocer, nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin composites in Class I and Class II restorations: a three-year evaluation.
    Mahmoud SH; El-Embaby AE; AbdAllah AM
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 23614660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Dalton Bittencourt D; Ezecelevski IG; Reis A; Van Dijken JW; Loguercio AD
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Jun; 63(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 16191912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Clinical evaluation of microhybrid composites in noncarious cervical lesions: 24-month results.
    Tuncer D; Çelik C; Yamanel K; Arhun N
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 20(2):176-181. PubMed ID: 28091433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions.
    Ozgünaltay G; Onen A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 29(11):1037-41. PubMed ID: 12453256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
    Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis.
    Ritter AV; Heymann HO; Swift EJ; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):370-8. PubMed ID: 18666493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.