These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24809666)

  • 41. Ecological processes determining the distribution dynamics of vole populations during forest succession.
    Le Borgne H; Dupuch A; Fortin D
    Oecologia; 2018 Nov; 188(3):721-732. PubMed ID: 30244315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Individual variation in cognitive style reflects foraging and anti-predator strategies in a small mammal.
    Mazza V; Jacob J; Dammhahn M; Zaccaroni M; Eccard JA
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10157. PubMed ID: 31300696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Patch use in the arctic ground squirrel: effects of micro-topography and shrub encroachment in the Arctic Circle.
    Flower CE; Dalton JE; Whelan CJ; Brown JS; Gonzalez-Meler MA
    Oecologia; 2019 May; 190(1):243-254. PubMed ID: 31016381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Detecting predators and locating competitors while foraging: an experimental study of a medium-sized herbivore in an African savanna.
    Pays O; Blanchard P; Valeix M; Chamaillé-Jammes S; Duncan P; Périquet S; Lombard M; Ncube G; Tarakini T; Makuwe E; Fritz H
    Oecologia; 2012 Jun; 169(2):419-30. PubMed ID: 22200851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Unpacking chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) patch use: Do individuals respond to food patches as predicted by the marginal value theorem?
    O'Bryan LR; Lambeth SP; Schapiro SJ; Wilson ML
    Am J Primatol; 2020 Dec; 82(12):e23208. PubMed ID: 33118192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Field vole (Microtus agrestis) seasonal spacing behavior: the effect of predation risk by mustelids.
    Borowski Z; Owadowska E
    Naturwissenschaften; 2010 May; 97(5):487-93. PubMed ID: 20352179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The balancing act of foraging: mammalian herbivores trade-off multiple risks when selecting food patches.
    Camp MJ; Shipley LA; Johnson TR; Olsoy PJ; Forbey JS; Rachlow JL; Thornton DH
    Oecologia; 2017 Dec; 185(4):537-549. PubMed ID: 28963624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Indirect effects of prey swamping: differential seed predation during a bamboo masting event.
    Kitzberger T; Chaneton EJ; Caccia F
    Ecology; 2007 Oct; 88(10):2541-54. PubMed ID: 18027757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of predation risk on selectivity in heteromyid rodents.
    Leaver LA; Daly M
    Behav Processes; 2003 Aug; 64(1):71-75. PubMed ID: 12914997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How animals distribute themselves in space: variable energy landscapes.
    Masello JF; Kato A; Sommerfeld J; Mattern T; Quillfeldt P
    Front Zool; 2017; 14():33. PubMed ID: 28694838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Density-dependent prey mortality is determined by the spatial scale of predator foraging.
    McCarthy EK; White JW
    Oecologia; 2016 Feb; 180(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 26116266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Forager-mediated cascading effects on food resource species diversity.
    Ferreira CM; Dammhahn M; Eccard JA
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e9523. PubMed ID: 36415870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prior knowledge about spatial pattern affects patch assessment rather than movement between patches in tactile-feeding mallard.
    Klaassen RH; Nolet BA; VAN Leeuwen CH
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jan; 76(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17184349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Visit, consume and quit: Patch quality affects the three stages of foraging.
    Mella VSA; Possell M; Troxell-Smith SM; McArthur C
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Nov; 87(6):1615-1626. PubMed ID: 29995984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Foraging speed in staging flocks of semipalmated sandpipers: evidence for scramble competition.
    Beauchamp G
    Oecologia; 2012 Aug; 169(4):975-80. PubMed ID: 22302514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Depletion of deep marine food patches forces divers to give up early.
    Thums M; Bradshaw CJ; Sumner MD; Horsburgh JM; Hindell MA
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Jan; 82(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 22881702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Foraging Activity Pattern Is Shaped by Water Loss Rates in a Diurnal Desert Rodent.
    Levy O; Dayan T; Porter WP; Kronfeld-Schor N
    Am Nat; 2016 Aug; 188(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 27420785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Harvest rates and foraging strategy of Carollia perspicillata (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in an artificial food patch.
    Bernal-Páez C; Sánchez F
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():396-401. PubMed ID: 30036641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Compensatory Foraging in Stoichiometric Producer-Grazer Models.
    Peace A; Wang H
    Bull Math Biol; 2019 Dec; 81(12):4932-4950. PubMed ID: 31541384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Identifying preferred habitats of samango monkeys (Cercopithecus (nictitans) mitis erythrarchus) through patch use.
    Emerson SE; Brown JS
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():214-21. PubMed ID: 24432361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.