These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Reduced OSM for long duration targets: individuation or items loaded into VSTM? Guest D; Gellatly A; Pilling M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1541-53. PubMed ID: 22288695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What determines the object-level visual masking: The bottom-up role of topological change. Huang Y; He L; Wang W; Meng Q; Zhou T; Chen L J Vis; 2018 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 29305601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Gestalt grouping and common onset masking. Kahan TA; Mathis KM Percept Psychophys; 2002 Nov; 64(8):1248-59. PubMed ID: 12519023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Delayed offset of distracters masks a local target. Luiga I; Gellatly A; Bachmann T Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 20413101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Object individuation is invariant to attentional diffusion: Changes in the size of the attended region do not interact with object-substitution masking. Goodhew SC; Edwards M Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():358-364. PubMed ID: 27764691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reward-associated features capture attention in the absence of awareness: Evidence from object-substitution masking. Harris JA; Donohue SE; Schoenfeld MA; Hopf JM; Heinze HJ; Woldorff MG Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 137():116-123. PubMed ID: 27153978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. On the role of object representations in substitution masking. Moore CM; Lleras A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1171-1180. PubMed ID: 16366782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. How does target duration affect object substitution masking? Gellatly A; Pilling M; Carter W; Guest D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1267-79. PubMed ID: 20873938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Object-substitution masking weakens but does not eliminate shape interactions. Sweeny TD; D'Abreu LC; Elias E; Padama L Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2179-2189. PubMed ID: 28718174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A novel paradigm reveals the role of reentrant visual processes in object substitution masking. Jannati A; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1118-27. PubMed ID: 23673610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The spatial gradient of visual masking by object substitution. Jiang Y; Chun MM Vision Res; 2001 Nov; 41(24):3121-31. PubMed ID: 11711138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect. Xu B; Tanaka JW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Enns JT Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1321-31. PubMed ID: 15066393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Priming of Visual Search Facilitates Attention Shifts: Evidence From Object-Substitution Masking. Kristjánsson Á Perception; 2016 Mar; 45(3):255-64. PubMed ID: 26562865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]