These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24811038)

  • 41. Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations.
    Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Oct; 20(5):1015-36. PubMed ID: 7964527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. ERP evidence for temporal independence of set size and object updating in object substitution masking.
    Salahub CM; Emrich SM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):387-401. PubMed ID: 29204864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Neural bases of the interactions between spatial attention and conscious perception.
    Chica AB; Paz-Alonso PM; Valero-Cabré A; Bartolomeo P
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1269-79. PubMed ID: 22508767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention.
    Greenberg AS; Rosen M; Cutrone E; Behrmann M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1544-57. PubMed ID: 25832192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Do conscious perception and unconscious processing rely on independent mechanisms? A meta-contrast study.
    Peremen Z; Lamy D
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Feb; 24():22-32. PubMed ID: 24398259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Spatial attention and conscious perception: interactions and dissociations between and within endogenous and exogenous processes.
    Chica AB; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 22266110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Perceptual Errors Support the Notion of Masking by Object Substitution.
    Pilling M; Guest D; Andrews M
    Perception; 2019 Feb; 48(2):138-161. PubMed ID: 30799730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Asymmetry in object substitution masking occurs relative to the direction of spatial attention shift.
    Hirose N; Osaka N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Feb; 36(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 20121293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Top-down preparation modulates visual categorization but not subjective awareness of objects presented in natural backgrounds.
    Koivisto M; Kahila E
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():73-80. PubMed ID: 28202397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Implicit perception and level of processing in object-substitution masking.
    Chen Z; Treisman A
    Psychol Sci; 2009 May; 20(5):560-7. PubMed ID: 19368699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The role of conscious perception in attentional capture and object-file updating.
    Lamy D; Alon L; Carmel T; Shalev N
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 25413876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Temporal trimming: Evidence that common-onset masking shortens perceptual sampling of conscious object representations.
    Harrison GW; Rajsic J; Wilson DE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2171-2178. PubMed ID: 28718173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Spatial attention excludes external noise at the target location.
    Lu ZL; Lesmes LA; Dosher BA
    J Vis; 2002; 2(4):312-23. PubMed ID: 12678581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Searching in dynamic displays: effects of configural predictability and spatiotemporal continuity.
    Alvarez GA; Konkle T; Oliva A
    J Vis; 2007 Dec; 7(14):12.1-12. PubMed ID: 18217807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. When endogenous spatial attention improves conscious perception: effects of alerting and bottom-up activation.
    Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Chica AB
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jan; 23():63-73. PubMed ID: 24368166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Attend to it now or lose it forever: selective attention, metacontrast masking, and object substitution.
    Tata MS
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Oct; 64(7):1028-38. PubMed ID: 12489659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Implicit semantic perception in object substitution masking.
    Goodhew SC; Visser TA; Lipp OV; Dux PE
    Cognition; 2011 Jan; 118(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 21092944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. What have we learned from two decades of object-substitution masking? Time to update: Object individuation prevails over substitution.
    Goodhew SC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1249-1262. PubMed ID: 28263634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: support for signal enhancement.
    Carrasco M; Williams PE; Yeshurun Y
    J Vis; 2002; 2(6):467-79. PubMed ID: 12678645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Time course of spatial contextual interference: event history analyses of simultaneous masking by nonoverlapping patterns.
    Panis S; Hermens F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):129-44. PubMed ID: 23713795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.