These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24811085)

  • 1. A randomized clinical trial of the effect of low-level laser therapy before composite placement on postoperative sensitivity in class V restorations.
    Moosavi H; Maleknejad F; Sharifi M; Ahrari F
    Lasers Med Sci; 2015 May; 30(4):1245-9. PubMed ID: 24811085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of 940 nm laser diode irradiation prior to bonding procedure on postoperative sensitivity following class II composite restorations: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.
    Rezaei-Soufi L; Taheri M; Fekrazadas R; Farhadian M
    Lasers Med Sci; 2021 Jul; 36(5):1109-1116. PubMed ID: 33392782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postoperative sensitivity of self etch versus total etch adhesive.
    Yousaf A; Aman N; Manzoor MA; Shah JA; Dilrasheed
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jun; 24(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 24953909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
    Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
    Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. EFFECT OF LOW-LEVEL DIODE LASER ON DENTIN TOPOGRAPHY AND SYMPTOMATIC NONCARIOUS CERVICAL LESIONS PRIOR TO COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
    Hegazy RA; Mahmoud EM; Holiel AA
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2024 Jun; 24(2):101969. PubMed ID: 38821658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-year clinical evaluation of nonvital tooth whitening and resin composite restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(6):369-78; discussion 379. PubMed ID: 16417833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical comparison of bur- and laser-prepared minimally invasive occlusal resin composite restorations: two-year follow-up.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 20945740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bulk dentine replacement versus incrementally placed resin composite: A randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Hickey D; Sharif O; Janjua F; Brunton PA
    J Dent; 2016 Mar; 46():18-22. PubMed ID: 26826329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.
    Türkün LS; Celik EU
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 19058687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD010526. PubMed ID: 30834516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Peltz I; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD010526. PubMed ID: 27780315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations.
    Costa T; Rezende M; Sakamoto A; Bittencourt B; Dalzochio P; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):143-154. PubMed ID: 27892839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of repaired class V silorane and nano-hybrid composite restorations after preparation with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and diamond bur.
    Yaman BC; Efes BG; Dörter C; Gömeç Y; Erdilek D; Yazıcıoğlu O
    Lasers Med Sci; 2011 Mar; 26(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 20162317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.