206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24812210)
1. Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafés: Public risk perceptions contextualised.
Dijkstra AM; Critchley CR
Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 24812210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.
Capon A; Gillespie J; Rolfe M; Smith W
BMC Public Health; 2015 Apr; 15():424. PubMed ID: 25928741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States.
Scheufele DA; Corley EA; Shih TJ; Dalrymple KE; Ho SS
Nat Nanotechnol; 2009 Feb; 4(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 19197309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vulnerability and social justice as factors in emergent U.S. nanotechnology risk perceptions.
Conti J; Satterfield T; Harthorn BH
Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1734-48. PubMed ID: 21453374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic development of public attitudes towards science policymaking.
Okamura K
Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):465-79. PubMed ID: 26416555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value predispositions as perceptual filters: Comparing of public attitudes toward nanotechnology in the United States and Singapore.
Liang X; Ho SS; Brossard D; Xenos MA; Scheufele DA; Anderson AA; Hao X; He X
Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jul; 24(5):582-600. PubMed ID: 24292230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Labeling of nanotechnology consumer products can influence risk and benefit perceptions.
Siegrist M; Keller C
Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1762-9. PubMed ID: 22084863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nanotechnology risk perceptions and communication: emerging technologies, emerging challenges.
Pidgeon N; Harthorn B; Satterfield T
Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1694-700. PubMed ID: 22084861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards.
Siegrist M; Keller C; Kastenholz H; Frey S; Wiek A
Risk Anal; 2007 Feb; 27(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 17362400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production.
Fischer AR; van Dijk H; de Jonge J; Rowe G; Frewer LJ
Public Underst Sci; 2013 Oct; 22(7):817-31. PubMed ID: 23825237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging.
Siegrist M; Stampfli N; Kastenholz H; Keller C
Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):283-90. PubMed ID: 18406006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measuring risk/benefit perceptions of emerging technologies and their potential impact on communication of public opinion toward science.
Binder AR; Cacciatore MA; Scheufele DA; Shaw BR; Corley EA
Public Underst Sci; 2012 Oct; 21(7):830-47. PubMed ID: 23832561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.
Gehrke PJ
Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 23887250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Building the capacity for public engagement with science in the United States.
Guston DH
Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 24434713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fairness and nanotechnology concern.
McComas KA; Besley JC
Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1749-61. PubMed ID: 21883336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Encouraging death communication in a death-avoidant society: analysis of interviews with death café organizers.
Ito K; Tsuda S; Hagiwara M; Okamura T
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Sep; 23(1):944. PubMed ID: 37667361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: the hidden role of views on science, technology, and nature.
Vandermoere F; Blanchemanche S; Bieberstein A; Marette S; Roosen J
Public Underst Sci; 2011 Mar; 20(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 21657134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.
Sturgis P; Cooper H; Fife-Schaw C
New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):31-56. PubMed ID: 16552916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.
Barnett J; Cooper H; Senior V
Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):921-33. PubMed ID: 17958501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
