These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24812306)

  • 1. Balancing selection in species with separate sexes: insights from Fisher's geometric model.
    Connallon T; Clark AG
    Genetics; 2014 Jul; 197(3):991-1006. PubMed ID: 24812306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antagonistic pleiotropy in species with separate sexes, and the maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits and fitness.
    Zajitschek F; Connallon T
    Evolution; 2018 Jun; 72(6):1306-1316. PubMed ID: 29667189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Male-benefit sexually antagonistic genotypes show elevated vulnerability to inbreeding.
    Grieshop K; Berger D; Arnqvist G
    BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):134. PubMed ID: 28606137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism.
    Connallon T; Clark AG
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Feb; 281(1776):20132123. PubMed ID: 24335980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A general population genetic framework for antagonistic selection that accounts for demography and recurrent mutation.
    Connallon T; Clark AG
    Genetics; 2012 Apr; 190(4):1477-89. PubMed ID: 22298707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexually antagonistic selection on genetic variation underlying both male and female same-sex sexual behavior.
    Berger D; You T; Minano MR; Grieshop K; Lind MI; Arnqvist G; Maklakov AA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 May; 16():88. PubMed ID: 27175796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parental sex discrimination and intralocus sexual conflict.
    Patten MM; Haig D
    Biol Lett; 2009 Oct; 5(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 19435832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.
    Connallon T; Jordan CY
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Aug; 6(8):2273-84. PubMed ID: 27226163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fitness consequences of sex-specific selection.
    Connallon T; Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Evolution; 2010 Jun; 64(6):1671-82. PubMed ID: 20050912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Natural variation at a single gene generates sexual antagonism across fitness components in Drosophila.
    Rusuwa BB; Chung H; Allen SL; Frentiu FD; Chenoweth SF
    Curr Biol; 2022 Jul; 32(14):3161-3169.e7. PubMed ID: 35700732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex-specific dominance reversal of genetic variation for fitness.
    Grieshop K; Arnqvist G
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Dec; 16(12):e2006810. PubMed ID: 30533008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dispersal Alters the Nature and Scope of Sexually Antagonistic Variation.
    Flintham EO; Savolainen V; Mullon C
    Am Nat; 2021 May; 197(5):543-559. PubMed ID: 33908829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental test of the mutation-selection balance model for the maintenance of genetic variance in fitness components.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Nov; 285(1890):. PubMed ID: 30404880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict.
    Cox RM; Calsbeek R
    Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):176-87. PubMed ID: 19138156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex-dependent dominance at a single locus maintains variation in age at maturity in salmon.
    Barson NJ; Aykanat T; Hindar K; Baranski M; Bolstad GH; Fiske P; Jacq C; Jensen AJ; Johnston SE; Karlsson S; Kent M; Moen T; Niemelä E; Nome T; Næsje TF; Orell P; Romakkaniemi A; Sægrov H; Urdal K; Erkinaro J; Lien S; Primmer CR
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):405-8. PubMed ID: 26536110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
    Lewis Z; Wedell N; Hunt J
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2085-97. PubMed ID: 21729062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the extent of genome-wide intralocus sexual conflict via experimentally enforced gender-limited selection.
    Morrow EH; Stewart AD; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Jul; 21(4):1046-54. PubMed ID: 18462311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The potential for sexually antagonistic polymorphism in different genome regions.
    Jordan CY; Charlesworth D
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):505-16. PubMed ID: 22276544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexually antagonistic selection maintains genetic variance when sexual dimorphism evolves.
    Kaufmann P; Howie JM; Immonen E
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Mar; 290(1995):20222484. PubMed ID: 36946115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic Signatures of Sexual Conflict.
    Kasimatis KR; Nelson TC; Phillips PC
    J Hered; 2017 Oct; 108(7):780-790. PubMed ID: 29036624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.