These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24812744)

  • 1. The use of Twin Force functional fixed orthopedic appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yamazaki MS; Rosário HD; El-Haje O; Alvim-Pereira F; Paranhos LR
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 24812744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical and clinical considerations in correcting skeletal class II malocclusion with Forsus™.
    Adusumilli SP; Sudhakar P; Mummidi B; Varma DP; Arora S; Radhika A; Maheshwari A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):918-24. PubMed ID: 23404028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skeletal Class II treatment with Twin Force Bite Corrector: case reports.
    Altuğ-Ataç AT; Dalcı ÖN; Memikoğlu UT
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):e7-17. PubMed ID: 19641763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes comparison between the Jasper Jumper and Twin Force Bite Corrector in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
    Pinelli Henriques Fontes F; Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):286-296. PubMed ID: 32063473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correction of a Overjet and Overbite In Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Using Twin Block Appliance Therapy: A Case Report.
    Shastri D; Tandon P; Singh GK; Singh A; Sharma S
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(4):19-22. PubMed ID: 27029087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correction of a severe skeletal Class II occlusion with a fixed functional appliance anchored on mini-implants: a patient report.
    Gandedkar NH; Revankar AV; Ganeshkar SV
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):369-79. PubMed ID: 21491004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of the Herbst splint appliance in Class II malocclusion with different growth pattern.
    Schiavoni R; Grenga V
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19506745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the HERBST appliance with atypical extractions in the lower dental arch.
    Filho LC; Siqueira DF; de Castro RC; Comparim R; Blanco MR; de Almeida Cardoso M
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(4):19-24. PubMed ID: 24640071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of division II malocclusion in young adult with Forsus fatigue-resistant device.
    Krishna Nayak US; Goyal V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):289-91. PubMed ID: 22945727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.
    de Abreu Vigorito F; Dominguez GC; de Arruda Aidar LA
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24713559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.
    Neves LS; Janson G; Cançado RH; de Lima KJ; Fernandes TM; Henriques JF
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):54. PubMed ID: 25182030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Forsus Fatigue Resistance Appliance and Its Re-activation by Using Custom-made Crimp.
    Aileni KR; Rachala MR; Dharmender SR; Rajesh V; Sandeep B
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 27319039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An esthetic treatment outcome of orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in class II treatment: a cephalometric study.
    Kabbur KJ; Hemanth M; Patil GS; Sathyadeep V; Shamnur N; Harieesha KB; Praveen GR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):602-6. PubMed ID: 23250160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of a unilateral class II malocclusion with Sabbagh Universal Spring: a case report.
    Hematpour S; Rahimi H; Mahmoudi F
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(2):9-12. PubMed ID: 25109052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of Forsus fatigue-resistant device in a patient with Class I malocclusion and mandibular incisor agenesis.
    Zhang R; Bai Y; Li S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):817-27. PubMed ID: 24880853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Class II correction with the Cantilever Bite Jumper.
    Moro A; Janson G; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Petrelli NE; Lauris JP
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 19216611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined orthodontic-orthopedic approach: a second choice in some surgical cases.
    Dahan J
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):e35-45. PubMed ID: 19641767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.