These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24813470)

  • 1. Impact of template choice on homology model efficiency in virtual screening.
    Rataj K; Witek J; Mordalski S; Kosciolek T; Bojarski AJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1661-8. PubMed ID: 24813470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From heptahelical bundle to hits from the Haystack: structure-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands.
    Kooistra AJ; Roumen L; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 522():279-336. PubMed ID: 23374191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.
    Jaiteh M; Rodríguez-Espigares I; Selent J; Carlsson J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007680. PubMed ID: 32168319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures.
    Castleman PN; Sears CK; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ligand-optimized homology models of D₁ and D₂ dopamine receptors: application for virtual screening.
    Kołaczkowski M; Bucki A; Feder M; Pawłowski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):638-48. PubMed ID: 23398329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
    Loo JSE; Emtage AL; Ng KW; Yong ASJ; Doughty SW
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of molecular dynamics sampling on the performance of virtual screening against GPCRs.
    Tarcsay A; Paragi G; Vass M; Jójárt B; Bogár F; Keserű GM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):2990-9. PubMed ID: 24116387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors with X-ray structures on the rise.
    Yarnitzky T; Levit A; Niv MY
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2010 May; 13(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 20443165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies for improved modeling of GPCR-drug complexes: blind predictions of serotonin receptors bound to ergotamine.
    Rodríguez D; Ranganathan A; Carlsson J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2004-21. PubMed ID: 25030302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current assessment of docking into GPCR crystal structures and homology models: successes, challenges, and guidelines.
    Beuming T; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3263-77. PubMed ID: 23121495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.
    Szwabowski GL; Castleman PN; Sears CK; Wink LH; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1027-1044. PubMed ID: 32737667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ligand-steered modeling and docking: A benchmarking study in class A G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Phatak SS; Gatica EA; Cavasotto CN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2119-28. PubMed ID: 21080692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to Choose the Suitable Template for Homology Modelling of GPCRs: 5-HT7 Receptor as a Test Case.
    Shahaf N; Pappalardo M; Basile L; Guccione S; Rayan A
    Mol Inform; 2016 Sep; 35(8-9):414-23. PubMed ID: 27546045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extended template-based modeling and evaluation method using consensus of binding mode of GPCRs for virtual screening.
    Sato M; Hirokawa T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3153-61. PubMed ID: 25350693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New strategy for receptor-based pharmacophore query construction: a case study for 5-HT₇ receptor ligands.
    Kurczab R; Bojarski AJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3233-43. PubMed ID: 24245803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvising 5-HT
    Jha P; Chaturvedi S; Swastika ; Pal S; Jain N; Mishra AK
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2018 Aug; 36(10):2475-2494. PubMed ID: 28745550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PREDICT modeling and in-silico screening for G-protein coupled receptors.
    Shacham S; Marantz Y; Bar-Haim S; Kalid O; Warshaviak D; Avisar N; Inbal B; Heifetz A; Fichman M; Topf M; Naor Z; Noiman S; Becker OM
    Proteins; 2004 Oct; 57(1):51-86. PubMed ID: 15326594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring.
    Radestock S; Weil T; Renner S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1104-17. PubMed ID: 18442221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency of Homology Modeling Assisted Molecular Docking in G-protein Coupled Receptors.
    Bhunia SS; Saxena AK
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2021; 21(4):269-294. PubMed ID: 32901584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Homology model-assisted elucidation of binding sites in GPCRs.
    Levit A; Barak D; Behrens M; Meyerhof W; Niv MY
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 914():179-205. PubMed ID: 22976029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.