These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24813529)

  • 1. Reliability of semiquantitative ¹⁸F-FDG PET parameters derived from simultaneous brain PET/MRI: a feasibility study.
    Jena A; Taneja S; Goel R; Renjen P; Negi P
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1269-1274. PubMed ID: 24813529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Standardized Uptake Values in Normal Structures Between PET/CT and PET/MRI in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
    Lyons K; Seghers V; Sorensen JI; Zhang W; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1094-101. PubMed ID: 26496558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hybrid [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/MRI including non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): preliminary results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Heusch P; Köhler J; Wittsack HJ; Heusner TA; Buchbender C; Poeppel TD; Nensa F; Wetter A; Gauler T; Hartung V; Lanzman RS
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2055-60. PubMed ID: 23830904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of
    Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Sarin R; Das PK; Singhal M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 28678576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac FDG PET on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner: comparison with standard CT attenuation correction.
    Vontobel J; Liga R; Possner M; Clerc OF; Mikulicic F; Veit-Haibach P; Ter Voert EE; Fuchs TA; Stehli J; Pazhenkottil AP; Benz DC; Gräni C; Gaemperli O; Herzog B; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(10):1574-80. PubMed ID: 26091704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI for the quantitative volumetric and metabolic measurements of abdominal fat tissues using fat segmentation.
    Im HJ; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Kim EE; Lee JS; Goo JM; Kang KW; Chung JK; Lee DS
    Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jun; 37(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 26836629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-Atlas-Based Attenuation Correction for Brain 18F-FDG PET Imaging Using a Time-of-Flight PET/MR Scanner: Comparison with Clinical Single-Atlas- and CT-Based Attenuation Correction.
    Sekine T; Burgos N; Warnock G; Huellner M; Buck A; Ter Voert EE; Cardoso MJ; Hutton BF; Ourselin S; Veit-Haibach P; Delso G
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1258-64. PubMed ID: 27013697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results.
    Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
    Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
    Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of neuroendocrine liver metastases: a comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
    Armbruster M; Sourbron S; Haug A; Zech CJ; Ingrisch M; Auernhammer CJ; Nikolaou K; Paprottka PM; Rist C; Reiser MF; Sommer WH
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 24002080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adrenal masses in patients with cancer: PET/CT characterization with combined CT histogram and standardized uptake value PET analysis.
    Perri M; Erba P; Volterrani D; Guidoccio F; Lazzeri E; Caramella D; Mariani G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jul; 197(1):209-16. PubMed ID: 21701032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Multiphase Level-Set Method.
    An HJ; Seo S; Kang H; Choi H; Cheon GJ; Kim HJ; Lee DS; Song IC; Kim YK; Lee JS
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 57(4):587-93. PubMed ID: 26697962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 18F-FDG PET of common enhancing malignant brain tumors.
    Kosaka N; Tsuchida T; Uematsu H; Kimura H; Okazawa H; Itoh H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W365-9. PubMed ID: 18492879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of segmentation-based attenuation correction methods for PET/MRI: evaluation of bone and liver standardized uptake value with oncologic PET/CT data.
    Kim JH; Lee JS; Song IC; Lee DS
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 53(12):1878-82. PubMed ID: 23081993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
    Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of intravenous contrast in PET/CT: does it really introduce significant attenuation correction error?
    Yau YY; Chan WS; Tam YM; Vernon P; Wong S; Coel M; Chu SK
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Feb; 46(2):283-91. PubMed ID: 15695788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PET attenuation correction using synthetic CT from ultrashort echo-time MR imaging.
    Roy S; Wang WT; Carass A; Prince JL; Butman JA; Pham DL
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Dec; 55(12):2071-7. PubMed ID: 25413135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thoracic staging in lung cancer: prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging and 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Gauler T; Gomez B; Reis H; Stamatis G; Kühl H; Hartung V; Heusner TA
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Mar; 55(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 24504054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative studies using positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis and therapy planning of oncological patients.
    Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A; Strauss L
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2006; 9(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 16617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography.
    Degirmenci B; Wilson D; Laymon CM; Becker C; Mason NS; Bencherif B; Agarwal A; Luketich J; Landreneau R; Avril N
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):614-22. PubMed ID: 18528183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.