These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24813941)

  • 1. Different Pearl Indices in studies of hormonal contraceptives in the United States: impact of study population.
    Gerlinger C; Trussell J; Mellinger U; Merz M; Marr J; Bannemerschult R; Schellschmidt I; Endrikat J
    Contraception; 2014 Aug; 90(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 24813941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of a low-dose contraceptive patch on efficacy, bleeding pattern, and safety: a 1-year, multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled study.
    Wiegratz I; Bassol S; Weisberg E; Mellinger U; Merz M
    Reprod Sci; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1518-25. PubMed ID: 24784719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bleeding pattern and cycle control of a low-dose transdermal contraceptive patch compared with a combined oral contraceptive: a randomized study.
    Merz M; Kroll R; Lynen R; Bangerter K
    Contraception; 2015 Feb; 91(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 25453585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of hormonal contraceptives on microbial flora of gingival sulcus.
    Klinger G; Eick S; Klinger G; Pfister W; Gräser T; Moore C; Oettel M
    Contraception; 1998 Jun; 57(6):381-4. PubMed ID: 9693397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of bleeding patterns and cycle control using two transdermal contraceptive systems: a multicenter, open-label, randomized study.
    Gruber D; Skřivánek A; Serrani M; Lanius V; Merz M
    Contraception; 2015 Feb; 91(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 25453582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative metabolic study of two low-estrogen-dose oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene progestins.
    Crook D; Godsland IF; Worthington M; Felton CV; Proudler AJ; Stevenson JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Nov; 169(5):1183-9. PubMed ID: 8238183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of ovarian follicular activity during treatment with a monthly injectable contraceptive and a low-dose oral contraceptive.
    Jain JK; Ota F; Mishell DR
    Contraception; 2000 Mar; 61(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 10827333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-dose levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol patch and pill: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kaunitz AM; Portman D; Westhoff CL; Archer DF; Mishell DR; Rubin A; Foegh M
    Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 123(2 Pt 1):295-303. PubMed ID: 24402597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hormonal versus non-hormonal contraceptives in women with diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2.
    Visser J; Snel M; Van Vliet HA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD003990. PubMed ID: 23543528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Control of fertility with oral medication.
    Diddle AW; Watts GF; Gardner WH; Williamson PJ
    West J Surg Obstet Gynecol; 1964; 72():222-9. PubMed ID: 12305556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical experience with a modern low-dose oral contraceptive in almost 100,000 users.
    Brill K; Norpoth T; Schnitker J; Albring M
    Contraception; 1991 Feb; 43(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 2040166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study on the acceptability of two modern monophasic oral contraceptive preparations: 30 microgram ethinyl estradiol combined with 150 microgram desogestrel or 75 microgram gestodene.
    Zichella L; Sbrignadello C; Tomassini A; Di Lieto A; Montoneri C; Zarbo G; Mancone M; Pietrobattista P; Bertoli G; Perrone G
    Adv Contracept; 1999; 15(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 11019950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives, Minulet and Mercilon, in women over 30 years of age.
    Kirkman RJ; Pedersen JH; Fioretti P; Roberts HE
    Contraception; 1994 Jan; 49(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 8137624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective multicentre study comparing levonorgestrel implants with a combined contraceptive pill: final results.
    Kirkman RJ; Bromham DR; O'Connor TP; Sahota JE
    Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 10454652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. International Active Surveillance Study of Women Taking Oral Contraceptives (INAS-OC Study).
    Dinger JC; Bardenheuer K; Assmann A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Nov; 9():77. PubMed ID: 19922634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of transdermal hormonal contraception : focus on the ethinylestradiol/norelgestromin contraceptive patch.
    Graziottin A
    Treat Endocrinol; 2006; 5(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 17107221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An update on new orally administered contraceptives for women.
    Nelson AL
    Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2015; 16(18):2759-72. PubMed ID: 26512437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical study of low-dose oral contraceptives (with low-doses of ethinyl estradiol), widely used in practice].
    Nalbanski B; Tsekova K; Ivanov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001; 41 Suppl 4():20-3. PubMed ID: 11519317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol in treating moderate acne vulgaris.
    Lucky AW; Henderson TA; Olson WH; Robisch DM; Lebwohl M; Swinyer LJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Nov; 37(5 Pt 1):746-54. PubMed ID: 9366821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High levels of women's satisfaction and compliance with transdermal contraception: results from a European multinational, 6-month study.
    Jakimiuk AJ; Crosignani PG; Chernev T; Prilepskaya V; Bergmans P; Von Poncet M; Marelli S; Lee EJ
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2011 Oct; 27(10):849-56. PubMed ID: 21142776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.