135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24815097)
1. Feasibility and acceptability of a computer-based tool to improve contraceptive counseling.
Wilson EK; Krieger KE; Koo HP; Minnis AM; Treiman K
Contraception; 2014 Jul; 90(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24815097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Computerized Family Planning Counseling Aid: A Pilot Study Evaluation of Smart Choices.
Koo HP; Wilson EK; Minnis AM
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2017 Mar; 49(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 28222240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient and provider perspectives on Bedsider.org, an online contraceptive information tool, in a low income, racially diverse clinic population.
Gressel GM; Lundsberg LS; Illuzzi JL; Danton CM; Sheth SS; Xu X; Gariepy A
Contraception; 2014 Dec; 90(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 25139723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and testing of an iOS waiting room "app" for contraceptive counseling in a Title X family planning clinic.
Gilliam ML; Martins SL; Bartlett E; Mistretta SQ; Holl JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):481.e1-8. PubMed ID: 24881829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acceptability, feasibility and utility of a Mobile health family planning decision aid for postpartum women in Kenya.
Dev R; Woods NF; Unger JA; Kinuthia J; Matemo D; Farid S; Begnel ER; Kohler P; Drake AL
Reprod Health; 2019 Jul; 16(1):97. PubMed ID: 31286989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Counseling tools alone do not improve method continuation: further evidence from the decision-making tool for family planning clients and providers in Nicaragua.
Chin-Quee DS; Janowitz B; Otterness C
Contraception; 2007 Nov; 76(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 17963863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Service delivery characteristics associated with contraceptive use among youth clients in integrated voluntary counseling and HIV testing clinics in Kenya.
Baumgartner JN; Otieno-Masaba R; Weaver MA; Grey TW; Reynolds HW
AIDS Care; 2012; 24(10):1290-301. PubMed ID: 22435668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid for adolescent patients.
Chewning B; Mosena P; Wilson D; Erdman H; Potthoff S; Murphy A; Kuhnen KK
Patient Educ Couns; 1999 Nov; 38(3):227-39. PubMed ID: 10865688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Introduction strategies raise key questions.
Finger WR; Keller S
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1995 Sep; 16(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 12290471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applying motivational interviewing to contraceptive counseling: ESP for clinicians.
Petersen R; Payne P; Albright J; Holland H; Cabral R; Curtis KM
Contraception; 2004 Mar; 69(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 14969669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vanguard contraceptive users subject of Senegal research.
Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1985; 6(2):5-7. PubMed ID: 12266648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge and practice of contraception among pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic in Lagos University Teaching Hospital.
Olamijulo JA; Olorunfemi G
Niger J Med; 2012; 21(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 23304945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized controlled trial of a computer-based module to improve contraceptive method choice.
Garbers S; Meserve A; Kottke M; Hatcher R; Ventura A; Chiasson MA
Contraception; 2012 Oct; 86(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 22402258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The family planning quotient and reproductive life index (FPQ/RepLI) tool: a solution for family planning, reproductive life planning and contraception counseling.
Madrigal JM; Stempinski-Metoyer K; McManus AE; Zimmerman L; Patel A
Reprod Health; 2019 Aug; 16(1):125. PubMed ID: 31426800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A mixed-methods study of provider perspectives on My Birth Control: a contraceptive decision support tool designed to facilitate shared decision making.
Dehlendorf C; Reed R; Fitzpatrick J; Kuppermann M; Steinauer J; Kimport K
Contraception; 2019 Nov; 100(5):420-423. PubMed ID: 31404538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tailoring family planning services to the special needs of adolescents.
Winter L; Breckenmaker LC
Fam Plann Perspect; 1991; 23(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 2029940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contraceptive methods: do Hispanic adolescents and their family planning care providers think about contraceptive methods the same way?
Erickson PI
Med Anthropol; 1996 May; 17(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 8757713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The attitudes of clinic staff as factors in women's selection of Norplant implants for their contraception.
Frank ML; Bateman L; Poindexter AN
Women Health; 1994; 21(4):75-88. PubMed ID: 7941612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implant. Reasons for and patterns of removal.
Haugen MM; Evans CB; Kim MH
J Reprod Med; 1996 Nov; 41(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 8951137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use.
Landry DJ; Wei J; Frost JJ
Contraception; 2008 Jul; 78(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 18555817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
