174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24815098)
1. RU OK? The acceptability and feasibility of remote technologies for follow-up after early medical abortion.
Bracken H; Lohr PA; Taylor J; Morroni C; Winikoff B
Contraception; 2014 Jul; 90(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 24815098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up with a semiquantitative urine pregnancy test after medical abortion in Moldova and Uzbekistan.
Platais I; Tsereteli T; Comendant R; Kurbanbekova D; Winikoff B
Contraception; 2015 Feb; 91(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 25497383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Follow-up strategies to confirm the success of medical abortion of pregnancies up to 10 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses.
Schmidt-Hansen M; Cameron S; Lohr PA; Hasler E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):551-563.e13. PubMed ID: 31715147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of telephone follow-up after medical abortion.
Perriera LK; Reeves MF; Chen BA; Hohmann HL; Hayes J; Creinin MD
Contraception; 2010 Feb; 81(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 20103453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mobile phone messages to provide support to women during the home phase of medical abortion in South Africa: a randomised controlled trial.
Constant D; de Tolly K; Harries J; Myer L
Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 24850188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up after early medical abortion in Vietnam: a randomized controlled trial.
Ngoc NTN; Bracken H; Blum J; Nga NTB; Minh NH; van Nhang N; Lynd K; Winikoff B; Blumenthal PD
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 123(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 24463668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing office and telephone follow-up after medical abortion.
Chen MJ; Rounds KM; Creinin MD; Cansino C; Hou MY
Contraception; 2016 Aug; 94(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 27101901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Self-assessment of the outcome of early medical abortion versus clinic follow-up in India: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
Iyengar K; Paul M; Iyengar SD; Klingberg-Allvin M; Essén B; Bring J; Soni S; Gemzell-Danielsson K
Lancet Glob Health; 2015 Sep; 3(9):e537-45. PubMed ID: 26275330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial.
Constant D; Harries J; Daskilewicz K; Myer L; Gemzell-Danielsson K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179600. PubMed ID: 28640845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion: 12-month experience of a telephone call and self-performed low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test.
Michie L; Cameron ST
Contraception; 2014 May; 89(5):440-5. PubMed ID: 24560481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of remote and in-clinic follow-up after methotrexate/misoprostol abortion.
Dunn S; Panjwani D; Gupta M; Meaney C; Morgan R; Feuerstein E
Contraception; 2015 Sep; 92(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 26068140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acceptability and feasibility of mifepristone medical abortion in the early first trimester in Azerbaijan.
Louie KS; Tsereteli T; Chong E; Aliyeva F; Rzayeva G; Winikoff B
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2014 Dec; 19(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 25047120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Home self-administration of vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion at 50-63 days compared with gestation of below 50 days.
Kopp Kallner H; Fiala C; Stephansson O; Gemzell-Danielsson K
Hum Reprod; 2010 May; 25(5):1153-7. PubMed ID: 20172871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The efficacy and acceptability of mifepristone medical abortion with home administration misoprostol provided by private providers linked with the hospital: a prospective study of 433 patients].
Faucher P; Baunot N; Madelenat P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Apr; 33(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 15894206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current medical abortion care.
Creinin MD
Curr Womens Health Rep; 2003 Dec; 3(6):461-9. PubMed ID: 14613667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS).
Robson SC; Kelly T; Howel D; Deverill M; Hewison J; Lie ML; Stamp E; Armstrong N; May CR
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(53):1-124, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19906334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of completion of early medical abortion using a text questionnaire on mobile phones compared to a self-administered paper questionnaire among women attending four clinics, Cape Town, South Africa.
Constant D; de Tolly K; Harries J; Myer L
Reprod Health Matters; 2015 Feb; 22(44 Suppl 1):83-93. PubMed ID: 25702072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. WHO multinational study of three misoprostol regimens after mifepristone for early medical abortion.
Honkanen H; Piaggio G; Hertzen H; Bártfai G; Erdenetungalag R; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Gopalan S; Horga M; Jerve F; Mittal S; Thi Nhu Ngoc N; Peregoudov A; Prasad RN; Pretnar-Darovec A; Shah RS; Song S; Tang OS; Wu SC;
BJOG; 2004 Jul; 111(7):715-25. PubMed ID: 15198763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Women's opinions on the home management of early medical abortion in the UK.
Lohr PA; Wade J; Riley L; Fitzgibbon A; Furedi A
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2010 Jan; 36(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 20067668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simultaneous very low dose mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion.
Kapp N; Borgatta L; Ellis SC; Stubblefield P
Contraception; 2006 May; 73(5):525-7. PubMed ID: 16627039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
