These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24815748)
1. Oocyte and sperm donors' opinions on the acceptable number of offspring. Sydsjö G; Lampic C; Bladh M; Svanberg AS Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jul; 93(7):634-9. PubMed ID: 24815748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation. Isaksson S; Sydsjö G; Skoog Svanberg A; Lampic C Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25123638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors. Lampic C; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gamete donors' motivation in a Swedish national sample: is there any ambivalence? A descriptive study. Svanberg AS; Lampic C; Gejervall AL; Gudmundsson J; Karlström PO; Solensten NG; Sydsjö G Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Aug; 91(8):944-51. PubMed ID: 22536824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm. Svanberg AS; Sydsjö G; Bladh M; Lampic C J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation? Isaksson S; Skoog Svanberg A; Sydsjö G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Karlström PO; Solensten NG; Lampic C Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 21212053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years. Isaksson S; Sydsjö G; Skoog Svanberg A; Lampic C Hum Reprod; 2012 Oct; 27(10):2998-3007. PubMed ID: 22859508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gamete donors' satisfaction; gender differences and similarities among oocyte and sperm donors in a national sample. Skoog Svanberg A; Lampic C; Gejerwall AL; Gudmundsson J; Karlström PO; Solensten NG; Sydsjö G Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Sep; 92(9):1049-56. PubMed ID: 23611727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey. Lee MS; Farland LV; Missmer SA; Ginsburg ES Fertil Steril; 2017 Jun; 107(6):1355-1363.e4. PubMed ID: 28390693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sperm donor recruitment, attitudes and provider practices--5 years after the removal of donor anonymity. Shukla U; Deval B; Jansa Perez M; Hamoda H; Savvas M; Narvekar N Hum Reprod; 2013 Mar; 28(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 23315068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential sperm donors', recipients' and their partners' opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western Australia. Godman KM; Sanders K; Rosenberg M; Burton P Hum Reprod; 2006 Nov; 21(11):3022-6. PubMed ID: 16849591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term follow-up of mental health and satisfaction in a Swedish sample of sperm and egg donors after open-identity donation. Sydsjö G; Lampic C; Bladh M; Nedstrand E; Svanberg AS Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Dec; 47(6):103417. PubMed ID: 37931369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sperm and oocyte donors' experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Jadva V; Freeman T; Kramer W; Golombok S Hum Reprod; 2011 Mar; 26(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 21177310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motivations and attitudes of candidate sperm donors in Belgium. Thijssen A; Provoost V; Vandormael E; Dhont N; Pennings G; Ombelet W Fertil Steril; 2017 Sep; 108(3):539-547. PubMed ID: 28865553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The views of adult offspring of sperm donation: essential feedback for the development of ethical guidelines within the practice of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Mahlstedt PP; LaBounty K; Kennedy WT Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2236-46. PubMed ID: 19285663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametes. Raes I; Ravelingien A; Pennings G Hum Reprod; 2013 Mar; 28(3):560-5. PubMed ID: 23315060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Personality characteristics in a Swedish national sample of identifiable oocyte donors. Sydsjö G; Lampic C; Brändström S; Gudmundsson J; Karlström PO; Solensten NG; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Svanberg AS BJOG; 2011 Aug; 118(9):1067-72. PubMed ID: 21481152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research. Westlander G; Janson PO; Tägnfors U; Bergh C Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Egg Donor Informed Consent Tool (EDICT): development and validation of a new informed consent tool for oocyte donors. Skillern A; Cedars M; Huddleston H Fertil Steril; 2013 May; 99(6):1733-8. PubMed ID: 23410899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]