These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24816271)

  • 1. The role of effect grouping in free-choice response selection.
    Janczyk M; Kunde W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():49-54. PubMed ID: 24816271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociating decision strategies in free-choice tasks - A mouse tracking analysis.
    Vogel D; Scherbaum S; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():65-71. PubMed ID: 30015137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Free choice tasks as random generation tasks: an investigation through working memory manipulations.
    Naefgen C; Janczyk M
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2263-2275. PubMed ID: 29850924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of response grouping on free-choice decision making in a response selection task.
    Khan MA; Mourton S; Buckolz E; Adam JJ; Hayes AE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 20188342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contributions of expected sensory and affective action effects to action selection and performance: Evidence from forced- and free-choice tasks.
    Hommel B; Lippelt DP; Gurbuz E; Pfister R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):821-827. PubMed ID: 27519674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations.
    Pfister R; Kiesel A; Melcher T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):316-22. PubMed ID: 20875631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-action effect binding: A critical re-assessment.
    Weller L; Kunde W; Pfister R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():137-146. PubMed ID: 28942126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Movements or targets: what makes an action in action-effect learning?
    Hoffmann J; Lenhard A; Sebald A; Pfister R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2433-49. PubMed ID: 19526438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW; Capaldi EJ
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Nov; 136(6):943-74. PubMed ID: 20822210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations.
    Naefgen C; Dambacher M; Janczyk M
    Psychol Res; 2018 Nov; 82(6):1039-1052. PubMed ID: 28776264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of verbal instructions on effect-based action control.
    Eder AB; Dignath D
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):355-365. PubMed ID: 26847335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus-response links and the backward crosstalk effect - A comparison of forced- and free-choice tasks.
    Naefgen C; Caissie AF; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():23-29. PubMed ID: 28448839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motor plans persist to influence subsequent actions with four or more response alternatives.
    Tretyak V; Yarrow K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():9-17. PubMed ID: 24657597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metacognitive evaluation in the avoidance of demand.
    Dunn TL; Lutes DJ; Risko EF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1372-87. PubMed ID: 27123679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceiving by proxy: effect-based action control with unperceivable effects.
    Pfister R; Pfeuffer CU; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 24853628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning at any rate: action-effect learning for stimulus-based actions.
    Pfister R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jan; 75(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 20490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Willed action and attention to the selection of action.
    Lau HC; Rogers RD; Ramnani N; Passingham RE
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1407-15. PubMed ID: 15050566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.
    Bertenthal BI; Longo MR; Kosobud A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):210-25. PubMed ID: 16634666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate N - 2 repetition costs in task switching?
    Schuch S; Sommer A; Lukas S
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 29147794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manipulating response set in a choice reaction task: evidence for anatomical coding in response selection.
    Adam JJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 17923098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.