328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24818549)
1. Longitudinal assessment of colonoscopy quality indicators: a report from the Gastroenterology Practice Management Group.
Hernandez LV; Deas TM; Catalano MF; Guda NM; Huang L; Ketover SR; Etzkorn KP; Gutta KG; Morris SJ; Schmalz MJ; Klyve D; Allen JI
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Nov; 80(5):835-41. PubMed ID: 24818549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Longitudinal Study of Adenoma Detection Rate in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training.
Gianotti RJ; Oza SS; Tapper EB; Kothari D; Sheth SG
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Oct; 61(10):2831-2837. PubMed ID: 27405989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in a gastroenterology practice.
le Clercq CM; Mooi RJ; Winkens B; Salden BN; Bakker CM; van Nunen AB; Keulen EP; de Ridder RJ; Masclee AA; Sanduleanu S
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 26808394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Quality indicators for colonoscopy: differences in polyp detection between endoscopists at one hospital].
van Lelyveld N; van Oijen MG; Schwartz MP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(24):A4219. PubMed ID: 22742441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of "regression to the mean" on colonoscopy performance data.
Harewood GC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Apr; 81(4):1054-5. PubMed ID: 25805485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining and Applying Locally Relevant Benchmarks for the Adenoma Detection Rate.
Hilsden RJ; Rose SM; Dube C; Rostom A; Bridges R; McGregor SE; Brenner DR; Heitman SJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2019 Aug; 114(8):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 30848731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response.
Hernandez LV; Klyve D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Apr; 81(4):1055. PubMed ID: 25805486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of exclusion criteria on a physician's adenoma detection rate.
Marcondes FO; Dean KM; Schoen RE; Leffler DA; Rose S; Morris M; Mehrotra A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):668-75. PubMed ID: 26385275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate.
Patel NC; Islam RS; Wu Q; Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Crowell MD; Faigel DO
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 23199647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Colonoscopy Quality Measures Across Various Practice Settings and the Impact of Performance Scorecards.
Inra JA; Nayor J; Rosenblatt M; Mutinga M; Reddy SI; Syngal S; Kastrinos F
Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Apr; 62(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 27995405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement in colonoscopy quality metrics in clinical practice from 2000 to 2014.
Mathews SC; Zhao N; Holub JL; Lieberman D
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Oct; 90(4):651-655.e3. PubMed ID: 31207221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment.
Overholt BF; Brooks-Belli L; Grace M; Rankin K; Harrell R; Turyk M; Rosenberg FB; Barish RW; Gilinsky NH;
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Apr; 44(4):e80-6. PubMed ID: 19881361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
