These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24818871)

  • 61. Anaerobic digestion of Chinese cabbage waste silage with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous study.
    Kafle GK; Bhattarai S; Kim SH; Chen L
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(21-24):2708-17. PubMed ID: 25176305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparison of methane production by co-digesting fruit and vegetable waste with first stage and second stage anaerobic digester sludge from a two stage digester.
    Park ND; Thring RW; Helle SS
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(7):1252-7. PubMed ID: 22437023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effect of pig manure to grass silage ratio on methane production in batch anaerobic co-digestion of concentrated pig manure and grass silage.
    Xie S; Lawlor PG; Frost JP; Hu Z; Zhan X
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 May; 102(10):5728-33. PubMed ID: 21444203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Cow manure stabilizes anaerobic digestion of cocoa waste.
    Acosta N; Duh Kang I; Rabaey K; De Vrieze J
    Waste Manag; 2021 May; 126():508-516. PubMed ID: 33678560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Continuous dry fermentation of swine manure for biogas production.
    Chen C; Zheng D; Liu GJ; Deng LW; Long Y; Fan ZH
    Waste Manag; 2015 Apr; 38():436-42. PubMed ID: 25618755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The effect of mixed-enzyme addition in anaerobic digestion on methane yield of dairy cattle manure.
    Sutaryo S; Ward AJ; Møller HB
    Environ Technol; 2014; 35(17-20):2476-82. PubMed ID: 25145202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Dry anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure: Impact of total solids, substrate ratio and thermal pre treatment on methane yield and quality of biomanure.
    Arelli V; Begum S; Anupoju GR; Kuruti K; S S
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Apr; 253():273-280. PubMed ID: 29353756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Blending based optimisation and pretreatment strategies to enhance anaerobic digestion of poultry manure.
    Rodriguez-Verde I; Regueiro L; Lema JM; Carballa M
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():521-531. PubMed ID: 29126822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Anaerobic digestate water for Chlorella pyrenoidosa cultivation and employed as co-substrate with cow dung and chicken manure for methane and hydrogen production: A closed loop approach.
    Malolan R; Jayaraman RS; Adithya S; Arun J; Gopinath KP; SundarRajan P; Nasif O; Kim W; Govarthanan M
    Chemosphere; 2021 Mar; 266():128963. PubMed ID: 33218731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Benefits of supplementing an industrial waste anaerobic digester with energy crops for increased biogas production.
    Nges IA; Escobar F; Fu X; Björnsson L
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jan; 32(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 21975301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of sugar beet byproduct and pig manure: Effect of the organic loading rate (OLR) on process performance.
    Aboudi K; Álvarez-Gallego CJ; Romero-García LI
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Oct; 194():283-90. PubMed ID: 26210141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of methanogenic community structure and anaerobic process performance treating swine wastewater between pilot and optimized lab scale bioreactors.
    Kim W; Cho K; Lee S; Hwang S
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Oct; 145():48-56. PubMed ID: 23489568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Optimization of the anaerobic co-digestion of pasteurized slaughterhouse waste, pig slurry and glycerine.
    Rodríguez-Abalde Á; Flotats X; Fernández B
    Waste Manag; 2017 Mar; 61():521-528. PubMed ID: 28024897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes.
    Alvarez JA; Otero L; Lema JM
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Feb; 101(4):1153-8. PubMed ID: 19833510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of cattle slurry and cheese whey.
    Comino E; Riggio VA; Rosso M
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Jun; 114():46-53. PubMed ID: 22444637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Co-digestion of energy crops and industrial confectionery by-products with cow manure: batch-scale and farm-scale evaluation.
    Kaparaju P; Luostarinen S; Kalmari E; Kalmari J; Rintala J
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(10):275-80. PubMed ID: 12188558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Dry anaerobic digestion of high solids content dairy manure at high organic loading rates in psychrophilic sequence batch reactor.
    Massé DI; Saady NM
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2015 May; 99(10):4521-9. PubMed ID: 25773978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Bioenergy production from diluted poultry manure and microbial consortium inside Anaerobic Sludge Bed Reactor at sub-mesophilic conditions.
    Jaxybayeva A; Yangin-Gomec C; Cetecioglu Z; Ozbayram EG; Yilmaz F; Ince O
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2014; 49(10):775-85. PubMed ID: 25065830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Evolution of composition of dairy manure supernatant in a controlled dung pit.
    Rico C; García H; Rico JL; Fernández J; Renedo J
    Environ Technol; 2009 Dec; 30(13):1351-9. PubMed ID: 20088199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Thermal Pretreatment of Harvest Residues and Their Use in Anaerobic Co-digestion with Dairy Cow Manure.
    Kovačić Đ; Kralik D; Jovičić D; Rupčić S; Popović B; Tišma M
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2018 Feb; 184(2):471-483. PubMed ID: 28744715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.