These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24818987)

  • 1. Communication of unexpected and significant findings on chest radiographs with an automated PACS alert system.
    Hayes SA; Breen M; McLaughlin PD; Murphy KP; Henry MT; Maher MM; Ryan MF
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Aug; 11(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 24818987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strengthening your ties to referring physicians through RIS/PACS integration.
    Worthy S; Rounds KC; Soloway CB
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 12800559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 'Wet Reads' in the age of PACS: technical and workflow considerations for a preliminary report system.
    Mates J; Branstetter BF; Morgan MB; Lionetti DM; Chang PJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 17191102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electronic messaging system for communicating important, but nonemergent, abnormal imaging results.
    Eisenberg RL; Yamada K; Yam CS; Spirn PW; Kruskal JB
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):724-31. PubMed ID: 20884911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Important imaging finding e-mail alert system: experience after 3 years of implementation.
    Abujudeh HH; Kaewlai R; Choy G; Whelton DG; Rosenthal DI
    Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):747-53. PubMed ID: 19703870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Process improvement for follow-up radiology report recommendations of lung nodules.
    Lim PS; Schneider D; Sternlieb J; Taupin M; Sich N; Dian J; Jameson E; Frambes B; Taylor S
    BMJ Open Qual; 2019; 8(2):e000370. PubMed ID: 31206047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of chest radiograph reports.
    Hirvonen-Kari M; Sormaala MJ; Luoma K; Kivisaari L; Lohman M
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):926-31. PubMed ID: 24132767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective study of a PACS: information flow and clinical action in a medical intensive care unit.
    Kundel HL; Seshadri SB; Langlotz CP; Lanken PN; Horii SC; Nodine CF; Polansky M; Feingold E; Brikman I; Bozzo M; Redfern R
    Radiology; 1996 Apr; 199(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 8633138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audit of radiology communication systems for critical, urgent, and unexpected significant findings.
    Duncan KA; Drinkwater KJ; Dugar N; Howlett DC;
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Mar; 71(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 26738965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the impact of clinically embedded reading rooms on radiologist-referring clinician communication.
    Tillack AA; Borgstede JP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 May; 10(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 23642878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of PACS deployment strategy on dictation turnaround time of chest radiographs.
    Lepanto L; Paré G; Gauvin A
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 16554224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A picture is worth a thousand words: needs assessment for multimedia radiology reports in a large tertiary care medical center.
    Nayak L; Beaulieu CF; Rubin DL; Lipson JA
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1577-83. PubMed ID: 24200485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automated examination notification of emergency department images in a picture archiving and communication system.
    Andriole KP; Avrin DE; Weber E; Luth DM; Bazzill TM
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):143-4. PubMed ID: 11442076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a real-time interactive pulmonary nodule analysis system on chest digital radiographic images: a prospective study.
    van Beek EJ; Mullan B; Thompson B
    Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):571-5. PubMed ID: 18423313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems.
    Bryan S; Weatherburn G; Watkins J; Roddie M; Keen J; Muris N; Buxton MJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 May; 170(5):1153-9. PubMed ID: 9574575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.
    Guldbrandt LM
    Dan Med J; 2015 Mar; 62(3):. PubMed ID: 25748876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Renegotiating expertise: an examination of PACS and the challenges to radiology using a medical anthropologic approach.
    Tillack AA; Breiman RS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jan; 9(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 22221638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Filmless in New Jersey: the New Jersey Medical School PACS Project.
    Hirschorn D; Eber C; Samuels P; Gujrathi S; Baker SR
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():7-12. PubMed ID: 12105690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does PACS improve diagnostic accuracy in chest radiograph interpretations in clinical practice?
    Hurlen P; Borthne A; Dahl FA; Ostbye T; Gulbrandsen P
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 20888718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delays and errors in abnormal chest radiograph follow-up: a systems approach to promoting patient safety in radiology.
    Bhaludin BN; Shelmerdine SC; Arora S; Senbanjo T; Parthipun A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Aug; 20(4):453-9. PubMed ID: 24840650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.