These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction. Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome. Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension. Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol. Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Alfahmy A; Mahran A; Conroy B; Brewka RR; Ibrahim M; Sheyn D; El-Nashar SA; Hijaz A Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 34050771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. vNOTES versus Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Perioperative and Short-Term Outcomes. Morganstein T; Gangal M; Belzile E; Sohaei D; Bentaleb J; Reuveni-Salzman A; Merovitz L; Walter JE; Larouche M Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Sep; 35(9):1899-1908. PubMed ID: 39215808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair. Barba M; Cola A; Melocchi T; De Vicari D; Costa C; Volontè S; Sandullo L; Frigerio M Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Feb; 60(2):. PubMed ID: 38399607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function. De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect]. Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension]. Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse. Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse]. Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-term Outcomes of Non-robotic Single-incision Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Surgical Technique. Liu J; Kohn J; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):721-727. PubMed ID: 31146027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Wei D; Wang P; Niu X; Zhao X J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):915-922. PubMed ID: 30652385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with bone anchor fixation: short-term anatomic and functional results. Withagen MI; Vierhout ME; Mannaerts GH; van der Weiden RM Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Apr; 23(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 22086264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure. Hanes CR J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network study. Sanses TV; Shahryarinejad A; Molden S; Hoskey KA; Abbasy S; Patterson D; Saks EK; Weber LeBrun EE; Gamble TL; King VG; Nguyen AL; Abed H; Young SB; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):519.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19716533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]