These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Strategic top-down control versus attentional bias by previous reward history. Lynn J; Shin M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2207-16. PubMed ID: 26041273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orienting of attention with and without cue awareness. Herreros L; Lambert AJ; Chica AB Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():165-171. PubMed ID: 28284987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture. Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating the role of exogenous cueing on selection history formation. Grubb MA; Christensen G; Albanese J Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1282-1288. PubMed ID: 30924059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance. Moehler T; Fiehler K Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The neglected contribution of memory encoding in spatial cueing: A new theory of costs and benefits. Chen H; Wyble B Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):936-968. PubMed ID: 30080067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence of strategic effects in the modulation of orienting of attention. Nougier V; Rossi B; Alain C; Taddei F Ergonomics; 1996 Sep; 39(9):1119-33. PubMed ID: 8681933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-modal orienting of exogenous attention results in visual-cortical facilitation, not suppression. Keefe JM; Pokta E; Störmer VS Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10237. PubMed ID: 33986384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mixed signals: The effect of conflicting reward- and goal-driven biases on selective attention. Preciado D; Munneke J; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1297-1310. PubMed ID: 28439793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automaticity of phasic alertness: Evidence for a three-component model of visual cueing. Lin Z; Lu ZL Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1948-67. PubMed ID: 27173487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attentional asymmetries in a visual orienting task are related to temperament. Garner KG; Dux PE; Wagner J; Cummins TD; Chambers CD; Bellgrove MA Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(8):1508-15. PubMed ID: 22650182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Does Awareness Modulate Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Shifts of Attention Triggered by Value Learning? Bourgeois A; Neveu R; Vuilleumier P PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160469. PubMed ID: 27483371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities. Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture. Liao HI; Yeh SL Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 21645875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]