242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24820094)
1. Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose-volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images.
Hirose Y; Nakamura M; Tomita T; Kitsuda K; Notogawa T; Miki K; Nakamura K; Ishigaki T
J Radiat Res; 2014 Sep; 55(5):966-75. PubMed ID: 24820094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Superiority of a soft tissue-based setup using cone-beam computed tomography over a bony structure-based setup in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Sato H; Abe E; Utsunomiya S; Kaidu M; Yamana N; Tanaka K; Ohta A; Obinata M; Liu J; Kawaguchi G; Maruyama K; Ayukawa F; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):239–245. PubMed ID: 26699304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PTV margin analysis for prostate patients treated with initial pelvic nodal IMRT and prostate proton boost.
Su Z; Li Z; Henderson R; Hoppe B; Nichols RC; Bryant C; Mendenhall W; Mendenhall N
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(4):04NT04. PubMed ID: 30630135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining optimal planning target volume and image guidance policy for post-prostatectomy intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Bell LJ; Cox J; Eade T; Rinks M; Herschtal A; Kneebone A
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Jul; 10():151. PubMed ID: 26209446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis.
Hirose K; Sato M; Hatayama Y; Kawaguchi H; Komai F; Sohma M; Obara H; Suzuki M; Tanaka M; Fujioka I; Ichise K; Takai Y; Aoki M
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 13(1):106. PubMed ID: 29880006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptive radiotherapy and the dosimetric impact of inter- and intrafractional motion on the planning target volume for prostate cancer patients.
Böckelmann F; Putz F; Kallis K; Lettmaier S; Fietkau R; Bert C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2020 Jul; 196(7):647-656. PubMed ID: 32157345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interfractional and intrafractional errors assessed by daily cone-beam computed tomography in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a prospective study.
Lu H; Lin H; Feng G; Chen J; Shu L; Pang Q; Cheng J; Peng L; Wu D; Liao C; Mo Y
J Radiat Res; 2012 Nov; 53(6):954-60. PubMed ID: 22843373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adaptive off-line protocol for prostate external radiotherapy with cone beam computer tomography.
Piziorska M; Kukołowicz P; Zawadzka A; Pilichowska M; Pęczkowski P
Strahlenther Onkol; 2012 Nov; 188(11):1003-9. PubMed ID: 23053159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of optimal PTV margin for patients receiving CBCT-guided prostate IMRT: comparative analysis based on CBCT dose calculation with four different margins.
Gill SK; Reddy K; Campbell N; Chen C; Pearson D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):252–262. PubMed ID: 26699581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of the three degrees-of-freedom fiducial marker-based setup compared to soft tissue-based setup in hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Tanabe S; Utsunomiya S; Abe E; Sato H; Ohta A; Sakai H; Yamada T; Kaidu M; Aoyama H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):53-59. PubMed ID: 31054217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric and volumetric changes in the rectum and bladder in patients receiving CBCT-guided prostate IMRT: analysis based on daily CBCT dose calculation.
Pearson D; Gill SK; Campbell N; Reddy K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):107-117. PubMed ID: 27929486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A study on planning organ at risk volume for the rectum using cone beam computed tomography in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Prabhakar R; Oates R; Jones D; Kron T; Cramb J; Foroudi F; Geso M; Gill S
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24412028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of online/offline image guidance/adaptation approaches for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Qin A; Sun Y; Liang J; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1026-33. PubMed ID: 25832693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography on target localization for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma radiotherapy: reducing planning target volume.
Shimohigashi Y; Toya R; Saito T; Kono Y; Doi Y; Fukugawa Y; Watakabe T; Matsumoto T; Kai Y; Maruyama M; Oya N
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):14. PubMed ID: 33446225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A feature alignment score for online cone-beam CT-based image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Hargrave C; Deegan T; Poulsen M; Bednarz T; Harden F; Mengersen K
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2898-2911. PubMed ID: 29772077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Image-guided study of inter-fraction and intra-fraction set-up variability and margins in reverse semi-decubitus breast radiotherapy.
Lee J; Liu SH; Lin JB; Wu MH; Wu CJ; Tai HC; Hsu SM; Chen YJ; Tai JC; Chen YJ
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Dec; 13(1):254. PubMed ID: 30587208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study.
Mayyas E; Chetty IJ; Chetvertkov M; Wen N; Neicu T; Nurushev T; Ren L; Lu M; Stricker H; Pradhan D; Movsas B; Elshaikh MA
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041707. PubMed ID: 23556877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Observer uncertainties of soft tissue-based patient positioning in IGRT.
Hirose TA; Arimura H; Fukunaga JI; Ohga S; Yoshitake T; Shioyama Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 31957964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Probabilistic dose distribution from interfractional motion in carbon ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer shows rectum sparing with moderate target coverage degradation.
Bridges D; Kawamura H; Kanai T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203289. PubMed ID: 30169520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
