344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24820096)
1. Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Piccolo R; Galasso G; Capuano E; De Luca S; Esposito G; Trimarco B; Piscione F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96127. PubMed ID: 24820096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Targeting transradial approach: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Del Furia F; Giustino G; Chieffo A
Panminerva Med; 2016 Dec; 58(4):329-340. PubMed ID: 27359109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Rise of Transradial Artery Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Australia.
Ocsan RJ; Doost A; Marley P; Farshid A
J Interv Cardiol; 2020; 2020():4397697. PubMed ID: 33312077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-Analysis of Transradial vs Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Jhand A; Atti V; Gwon Y; Dhawan R; Turagam MK; Mamas MA; Brilakis ES; Kumar A; Katta N; Chatzizisis Y; Parikh M; Abbott JD; Kirtane AJ; Bhatt DL; Velagapudi P
Am J Cardiol; 2021 Feb; 141():23-30. PubMed ID: 33220324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects on Mortality and Major Bleeding of Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 7 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trials.
Gargiulo G; Giacoppo D; Jolly SS; Cairns J; Le May M; Bernat I; Romagnoli E; Rao SV; van Leeuwen MAH; Mehta SR; Bertrand OF; Wells GA; Meijers TA; Siontis GCM; Esposito G; Windecker S; Jüni P; Valgimigli M;
Circulation; 2022 Nov; 146(18):1329-1343. PubMed ID: 36036610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mortality and operator experience with vascular access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Shah R; Askari R; Haji SA; Rashid A
Int J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 248():114-119. PubMed ID: 28942869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.
Ratib K; Mamas MA; Anderson SG; Bhatia G; Routledge H; De Belder M; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):20-9. PubMed ID: 25616814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.
Rodriguez-Leor O; Fernandez-Nofrerias E; Carrillo X; Mauri J; Oliete C; Rivas Mdel C; Bayes-Genis A
Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 23453093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bajaj A; Pancholy S; Sothwal A; Nawaz Y; Boruah P
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep; 20(9):790-798. PubMed ID: 30442537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between radial and femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized trials.
Ye Y; Zeng Y
Coron Artery Dis; 2019 Mar; 30(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 30531449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Trans-radial approach versus trans-femoral approach in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Senguttuvan NB; Reddy PMK; Shankar P; Abdulkader RS; Yallanki HP; Kumar A; Majmundar M; Ramalingam V; Rajendran R; Bhoopalan K; Kaliyamoorthy D; T R M; Kalra A; Jayaraj R; Ramakrishnan S; Daggubati R; Thanikachalam S; Seth A; Bahl VK
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266709. PubMed ID: 35483028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety of transradial access compared to transfemoral access with hemostatic devices (vessel plugs and suture devices) after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chugh Y; Bavishi C; Mojadidi MK; Elgendy IY; Faillace RT; Brilakis ES; Tamis-Holland J; Mamas M; Chugh SK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 32521099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of Access Site Choice on Acute Kidney Injury After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Pancholy MS; Skelding K; Scott T; Blankenship J; Pancholy SB
Am J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 120(12):2141-2145. PubMed ID: 29100589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radial vs Femoral Approach in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta- Analysis of Randomized Trials.
Nardin M; Verdoia M; Barbieri L; Schaffer A; Suryapranata H; De Luca G
Curr Vasc Pharmacol; 2017; 16(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 28490313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
