189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24820133)
1. Heterogeneity in individual quality and reproductive trade-offs within species.
Lim JN; Senior AM; Nakagawa S
Evolution; 2014 Aug; 68(8):2306-18. PubMed ID: 24820133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive allometry and the size-number trade-off for lizards.
Warne RW; Charnov EL
Am Nat; 2008 Sep; 172(3):E80-98. PubMed ID: 18673058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selection and constraints on offspring size-number trade-offs in sand lizards (Lacerta agilis).
Ljungström G; Stjernstedt M; Wapstra E; Olsson M
J Evol Biol; 2016 May; 29(5):979-90. PubMed ID: 26851437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The evolutionary ecology of offspring size in marine invertebrates.
Marshall DJ; Keough MJ
Adv Mar Biol; 2007; 53():1-60. PubMed ID: 17936135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The offspring-size/clutch-size trade-off in mammals.
Charnov EL; Ernest SK
Am Nat; 2006 Apr; 167(4):578-82. PubMed ID: 16670999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The offspring-development-time/offspring-number trade-off.
Bueno J; López-Urrutia Á
Am Nat; 2012 Jun; 179(6):E196-203. PubMed ID: 22617271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relation between maternal phenotype and offspring size, explained by overhead material costs of reproduction.
Filin I
J Theor Biol; 2015 Jan; 364():168-78. PubMed ID: 25219621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Females allocate differentially to offspring size and number in response to male effects on female and offspring fitness.
Kindsvater HK; Alonzo SH
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Mar; 281(1779):20131981. PubMed ID: 24478292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic basis of the trade-off between offspring number and quality in the bank vole.
Mappes T; Koskela E
Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):645-50. PubMed ID: 15119447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Orchestration of avian reproductive effort: an integration of the ultimate and proximate bases for flexibility in clutch size, incubation behaviour, and yolk androgen deposition.
Sockman KW; Sharp PJ; Schwabl H
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 Nov; 81(4):629-66. PubMed ID: 17038202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corticosterone manipulation reveals differences in hierarchical organization of multidimensional reproductive trade-offs in r-strategist and K-strategist females.
Lancaster LT; Hazard LC; Clobert J; Sinervo BR
J Evol Biol; 2008 Mar; 21(2):556-65. PubMed ID: 18179517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress hormones: a link between maternal condition and sex-biased reproductive investment.
Love OP; Chin EH; Wynne-Edwards KE; Williams TD
Am Nat; 2005 Dec; 166(6):751-66. PubMed ID: 16475090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of offspring size-number invariants in 12 species of lizard.
Uller T; While GM; Wapstra E; Warner DA; Goodman BA; Schwarzkopf L; Langkilde T; Doughty P; Radder RS; Rohr DH; Bull CM; Shine R; Olsson M
J Evol Biol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 19120815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lifetime Fitness in Wild Female Baboons: Trade-Offs and Individual Heterogeneity in Quality.
McLean EM; Archie EA; Alberts SC
Am Nat; 2019 Dec; 194(6):745-759. PubMed ID: 31738100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond size-number trade-offs: clutch size as a maternal effect.
Brown GP; Shine R
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Apr; 364(1520):1097-106. PubMed ID: 19324614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A trade-off-invariant life-history rule for optimal offspring size.
Charnov EL; Downhower JF
Nature; 1995 Aug; 376(6539):418-9. PubMed ID: 7630415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The positive correlation between maternal size and offspring size: fitting pieces of a life-history puzzle.
Rollinson N; Rowe L
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2016 Nov; 91(4):1134-1148. PubMed ID: 26289842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial variation in egg size and egg number reflects trade-offs and bet-hedging in a freshwater fish.
Morrongiello JR; Bond NR; Crook DA; Wong BB
J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jul; 81(4):806-17. PubMed ID: 22309288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term research and hierarchical models reveal consistent fitness costs of being the last egg in a clutch.
Acevedo CR; Riecke TV; Leach AG; Lohman MG; Williams PJ; Sedinger JS
J Anim Ecol; 2020 Aug; 89(8):1978-1987. PubMed ID: 32248534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection for increased allocation to offspring number under environmental unpredictability.
Simons AM
J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):813-7. PubMed ID: 17305847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
