These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24820438)

  • 1. Returning to "inhibition of return" by dissociating long-term oculomotor IOR from short-term sensory adaptation and other nonoculomotor "inhibitory" cueing effects.
    Hilchey MD; Klein RM; Satel J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1603-16. PubMed ID: 24820438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibitory cueing effects following manual and saccadic responses to arrow cues.
    Ding Y; He T; Satel J; Wang Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1020-9. PubMed ID: 26956560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual and motor inhibition of return: components or flavors?
    Hilchey MD; Klein RM; Ivanoff J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1416-29. PubMed ID: 22714957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-response incompatibility eliminates inhibitory cueing effects with saccadic but not manual responses.
    Eng V; Lim A; Kwon S; Gan SR; Jamaluddin SA; Janssen SMJ; Satel J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 28229429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensory adaptation and inhibition of return: dissociating multiple inhibitory cueing effects.
    Lim A; Eng V; Janssen SMJ; Satel J
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1369-1382. PubMed ID: 29520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling inhibition of return as short-term depression of early sensory input to the superior colliculus.
    Satel J; Wang Z; Trappenberg TP; Klein RM
    Vision Res; 2011 May; 51(9):987-96. PubMed ID: 21354199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In search of a reliable electrophysiological marker of oculomotor inhibition of return.
    Satel J; Hilchey MD; Wang Z; Reiss CS; Klein RM
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Oct; 51(10):1037-45. PubMed ID: 24976355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the role of eye movement monitoring and discouragement on inhibition of return in a go/no-go task.
    Hilchey MD; Hashish M; MacLean GH; Satel J; Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    Vision Res; 2014 Mar; 96():133-9. PubMed ID: 24333328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. No supplementary evidence of attention to a spatial cue when saccadic facilitation is absent.
    MacInnes WJ; Bhatnagar R
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13289. PubMed ID: 30185930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of return revisited: Localized inhibition on top of a pervasive bias.
    Wang B; Yan C; Klein RM; Wang Z
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1861-1867. PubMed ID: 29247423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition of return generated by voluntary saccades is independent of attentional momentum.
    Machado L; Rafal R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 15204117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The gap effect reduces both manual and saccadic inhibition of return (IOR).
    Michalczyk Ł; Bielas J
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 237(7):1643-1653. PubMed ID: 30953082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peripheral stimuli generate different forms of inhibition of return when participants make prosaccades versus antisaccades to them.
    Redden RS; Hilchey MD; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2283-2291. PubMed ID: 27531017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
    Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cue repetition increases inhibition of return.
    Dukewich KR; Boehnke SE
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Dec; 448(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 18973792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The processes of facilitation and inhibition in a cue-target paradigm: insight from movement trajectory deviations.
    Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 22133725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the locus-of-slack logic to determine whether inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm is delaying early or late stages of processing.
    Kavyani M; Farsi A; Abdoli B; Klein RM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27936837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition of return and manual pointing movements.
    Fischer MH; Pratt J; Neggers SF
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Apr; 65(3):379-87. PubMed ID: 12785068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.