These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Modeling inhibition of return as short-term depression of early sensory input to the superior colliculus. Satel J; Wang Z; Trappenberg TP; Klein RM Vision Res; 2011 May; 51(9):987-96. PubMed ID: 21354199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In search of a reliable electrophysiological marker of oculomotor inhibition of return. Satel J; Hilchey MD; Wang Z; Reiss CS; Klein RM Psychophysiology; 2014 Oct; 51(10):1037-45. PubMed ID: 24976355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the role of eye movement monitoring and discouragement on inhibition of return in a go/no-go task. Hilchey MD; Hashish M; MacLean GH; Satel J; Ivanoff J; Klein RM Vision Res; 2014 Mar; 96():133-9. PubMed ID: 24333328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return. Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No supplementary evidence of attention to a spatial cue when saccadic facilitation is absent. MacInnes WJ; Bhatnagar R Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13289. PubMed ID: 30185930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inhibition of return revisited: Localized inhibition on top of a pervasive bias. Wang B; Yan C; Klein RM; Wang Z Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1861-1867. PubMed ID: 29247423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inhibition of return generated by voluntary saccades is independent of attentional momentum. Machado L; Rafal R Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 15204117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The gap effect reduces both manual and saccadic inhibition of return (IOR). Michalczyk Ł; Bielas J Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 237(7):1643-1653. PubMed ID: 30953082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peripheral stimuli generate different forms of inhibition of return when participants make prosaccades versus antisaccades to them. Redden RS; Hilchey MD; Klein RM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2283-2291. PubMed ID: 27531017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm. Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The processes of facilitation and inhibition in a cue-target paradigm: insight from movement trajectory deviations. Neyedli HF; Welsh TN Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 22133725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the locus-of-slack logic to determine whether inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm is delaying early or late stages of processing. Kavyani M; Farsi A; Abdoli B; Klein RM Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 71(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27936837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting. Zhou X; Chen Q Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inhibition of return and manual pointing movements. Fischer MH; Pratt J; Neggers SF Percept Psychophys; 2003 Apr; 65(3):379-87. PubMed ID: 12785068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]