142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24820596)
1. [Recommended age groups and frequency of mammography screening: a systematic review].
Pereira MB; Oliveira J; Ribeiro DP; Castro B; Yaphe J; de Sousa JC
Cien Saude Colet; 2014 Apr; 19(4):1135-40. PubMed ID: 24820596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cervical cancer screening: target age bracket, screening frequency and screening method: review of recent evidence and comparison with the Portuguese performance indicator].
Castro B; Ribeiro DP; Oliveira J; Pereira MB; Sousa JC; Yaphe J
Cien Saude Colet; 2014 Apr; 19(4):1113-22. PubMed ID: 24820594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in Brazil. II - New national recommendations, main evidence, and controversies.
Migowski A; Silva GAE; Dias MBK; Diz MDPE; Sant'Ana DR; Nadanovsky P
Cad Saude Publica; 2018 Jun; 34(6):e00074817. PubMed ID: 29947654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening.
Mainiero MB; Lourenco A; Mahoney MC; Newell MS; Bailey L; Barke LD; D'Orsi C; Harvey JA; Hayes MK; Huynh PT; Jokich PM; Lee SJ; Lehman CD; Mankoff DA; Nepute JA; Patel SB; Reynolds HE; Sutherland ML; Haffty BG
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 23290667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
Myers ER; Moorman P; Gierisch JM; Havrilesky LJ; Grimm LJ; Ghate S; Davidson B; Mongtomery RC; Crowley MJ; McCrory DC; Kendrick A; Sanders GD
JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(15):1615-34. PubMed ID: 26501537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you": breast imagers' perspectives regarding screening mammography for others and for themselves--do they practice what they preach?
Lee J; Gordon PB; Whitman GJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1336-44. PubMed ID: 26001246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years: A systematic review.
van den Ende C; Oordt-Speets AM; Vroling H; van Agt HME
Int J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 141(7):1295-1306. PubMed ID: 28542784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.
Pace LE; Keating NL
JAMA; 2014 Apr; 311(13):1327-35. PubMed ID: 24691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Referral for mammography often not according to guideline].
Lodder-van der Vlies D; Droogh-de Greve K; de Win JL; van der Zaag-Loonen HJ; van Bruggen JA; Markestein HP; Gratama JW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 159():A8636. PubMed ID: 25804111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
Ringash J;
CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lack of Impact of the 2009 USPSTF Guidelines on Rates of Mammography Screening.
Brown C; Nevola A; Martin BC
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2018 Jul; 27(7):875-884. PubMed ID: 29583065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review.
Gartlehner G; Thaler KJ; Chapman A; Kaminski A; Berzaczy D; Van Noord MG; Helbich TH
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2013 Jun; 11(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23750571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
US Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First report of introducing population-based breast cancer screening in Poland: experience of the 3-million population region of Lower Silesia.
Matkowski R; Szynglarewicz B
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):e111-5. PubMed ID: 21840281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer screening: why, when, and how many?
Gemignani ML
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 54(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21278511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
Nelson HD; Fu R; Cantor A; Pappas M; Daeges M; Humphrey L
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):244-55. PubMed ID: 26756588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The European advocacy perspective on mammography screening.
Knox S
Breast; 2011 Feb; 20(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 20708405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
