175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24820633)
1. A prospective randomized study comparing transnasal and peroral 5-mm ultrathin endoscopy.
Lin LF; Ma KZ; Tu HL
J Formos Med Assoc; 2014 Jun; 113(6):371-6. PubMed ID: 24820633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope.
Zaman A; Hahn M; Hapke R; Knigge K; Fennerty MB; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):279-84. PubMed ID: 10049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: a randomized trial.
Trevisani L; Cifalà V; Sartori S; Gilli G; Matarese G; Abbasciano V
World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 13(6):906-11. PubMed ID: 17352021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger versus older patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Motomura Y; Matsui N; Kubokawa M; Kimura M; Ouchi J; Honda K; Endo S; Nakamura K; Takayanagi R
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 42(9):965-8. PubMed ID: 18622302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the transnasal access for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine use equal to the transoral route? A prospective, randomized trial.
Knuth J; Kunze DE; Benz C; Bulian DR; Heiss MM; Lefering R; Saad S; Saers T; Krakamp B
Z Gastroenterol; 2013 Dec; 51(12):1369-76. PubMed ID: 24146101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of transnasal small-caliber vs. peroral conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating varices in unsedated cirrhotic patients.
Choe WH; Kim JH; Ko SY; Kwon SY; Kim BK; Rhee KH; Seo TH; Lee TY; Hong SN; Lee SY; Sung IK; Park HS; Shim CS
Endoscopy; 2011 Aug; 43(8):649-56. PubMed ID: 21660907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients.
Dumortier J; Napoleon B; Hedelius F; Pellissier PE; Leprince E; Pujol B; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Feb; 57(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 12556784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of unsedated transnasal endoscopy for pharyngeal observation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. A prospective study to assess cardiopulmonary function.
Tsuboi M; Arai M; Maruoka D; Matsumura T; Nakagawa T; Katsuno T; Yokosuka O
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):884-9. PubMed ID: 23731392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy.
Zaman A; Hapke R; Sahagun G; Katon RM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Aug; 93(8):1260-3. PubMed ID: 9707048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients.
Craig A; Hanlon J; Dent J; Schoeman M
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):292-6. PubMed ID: 10049410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated endoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using 5.5-mm video endoscopy.
Watanabe H; Watanabe N; Ogura R; Nishino N; Saifuku Y; Hitomi G; Okamoto Y; Tominaga K; Yoshitake N; Yamagata M; Orui M; Hiraishi H
Dig Dis Sci; 2009 Oct; 54(10):2155-60. PubMed ID: 19082719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a Canadian experience in daily practice.
Cho S; Arya N; Swan K; Cirocco M; Kandel G; Kortan P; Marcon N
Can J Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 22(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 18354752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility and stability of transnasal endoscopy for examination of the pharynx - a prospective study and comparison with transoral endoscopy.
Tsuboi M; Arai M; Maruoka D; Matsumura T; Nakagawa T; Katsuno T; Yokosuka O
Int J Med Sci; 2013; 10(9):1085-91. PubMed ID: 23869183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
