These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24820921)
1. Physician's expectations regarding prescribing clinical decision support systems in a Belgian hospital. Cornu P; Steurbaut S; De Beukeleer M; Putman K; van de Velde R; Dupont AG Acta Clin Belg; 2014 Jun; 69(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 24820921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors determining the adherence to antimicrobial guidelines and the adoption of computerised decision support systems by physicians: A qualitative study in three European hospitals. Catho G; Centemero NS; Catho H; Ranzani A; Balmelli C; Landelle C; Zanichelli V; Huttner BD; Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104233. PubMed ID: 32736330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of provider characteristics on the responses to medication-related decision support alerts. Cho I; Slight SP; Nanji KC; Seger DL; Maniam N; Fiskio JM; Dykes PC; Bates DW Int J Med Inform; 2015 Sep; 84(9):630-9. PubMed ID: 26004341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential safety gaps in order entry and automated drug alerts: a nationwide survey of VA physician self-reported practices with computerized order entry. Spina JR; Glassman PA; Simon B; Lanto A; Lee M; Cunningham F; Good CB Med Care; 2011 Oct; 49(10):904-10. PubMed ID: 21666510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007). Pearson SA; Moxey A; Robertson J; Hains I; Williamson M; Reeve J; Newby D BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Aug; 9():154. PubMed ID: 19715591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physicians' responses to clinical decision support on an intensive care unit--comparison of four different alerting methods. Scheepers-Hoeks AM; Grouls RJ; Neef C; Ackerman EW; Korsten EH Artif Intell Med; 2013 Sep; 59(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23746663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Robertson J; Walkom E; Pearson SA; Hains I; Williamsone M; Newby D Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Apr; 18(2):69-87. PubMed ID: 20441116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Making pharmacogenomic-based prescribing alerts more effective: A scenario-based pilot study with physicians. Overby CL; Devine EB; Abernethy N; McCune JS; Tarczy-Hornoch P J Biomed Inform; 2015 Jun; 55():249-59. PubMed ID: 25957826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A critical evaluation of clinical decision support for the detection of drug-drug interactions. Smithburger PL; Buckley MS; Bejian S; Burenheide K; Kane-Gill SL Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2011 Nov; 10(6):871-82. PubMed ID: 21542665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physicians' decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care. Weingart SN; Toth M; Sands DZ; Aronson MD; Davis RB; Phillips RS Arch Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 163(21):2625-31. PubMed ID: 14638563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A survey-based inventory of clinical decision support systems in computerised provider order entry in Swiss hospitals. Carli-Ghabarou D; Seidling HM; Bonnabry P; Lovis C Swiss Med Wkly; 2013; 143():w13894. PubMed ID: 24338034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychosocial determinants of physicians' acceptance of recommendations by antibiotic computerised decision support systems: A mixed methods study. Chow A; Lye DC; Arah OA Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2015 Mar; 45(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 25434998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The medical office of the 21st century (MOXXI): effectiveness of computerized decision-making support in reducing inappropriate prescribing in primary care. Tamblyn R; Huang A; Perreault R; Jacques A; Roy D; Hanley J; McLeod P; Laprise R CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 12975221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: a focus group study. Weingart SN; Massagli M; Cyrulik A; Isaac T; Morway L; Sands DZ; Weissman JS Int J Med Inform; 2009 Sep; 78(9):571-8. PubMed ID: 19395307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Decision Support Systems for Drug Allergy Checking: Systematic Review. Légat L; Van Laere S; Nyssen M; Steurbaut S; Dupont AG; Cornu P J Med Internet Res; 2018 Sep; 20(9):e258. PubMed ID: 30194058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized decision support to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing to older emergency department patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Terrell KM; Perkins AJ; Dexter PR; Hui SL; Callahan CM; Miller DK J Am Geriatr Soc; 2009 Aug; 57(8):1388-94. PubMed ID: 19549022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adoption of clinical decision support systems in a developing country: Antecedents and outcomes of physician's threat to perceived professional autonomy. Esmaeilzadeh P; Sambasivan M; Kumar N; Nezakati H Int J Med Inform; 2015 Aug; 84(8):548-60. PubMed ID: 25920928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. User perspectives on an electronic decision-support tool performing comprehensive medication reviews - a focus group study with physicians and nurses. Koskela T; Sandström S; Mäkinen J; Liira H BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jan; 16():6. PubMed ID: 26801630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential drug-related problems detected by electronic expert support system: physicians' views on clinical relevance. Hammar T; Lidström B; Petersson G; Gustafson Y; Eiermann B Int J Clin Pharm; 2015 Oct; 37(5):941-8. PubMed ID: 26047943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reasons for physician non-adherence to electronic drug alerts. Taylor LK; Tamblyn R Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1101-5. PubMed ID: 15360983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]