243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24820921)
1. Physician's expectations regarding prescribing clinical decision support systems in a Belgian hospital.
Cornu P; Steurbaut S; De Beukeleer M; Putman K; van de Velde R; Dupont AG
Acta Clin Belg; 2014 Jun; 69(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 24820921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors determining the adherence to antimicrobial guidelines and the adoption of computerised decision support systems by physicians: A qualitative study in three European hospitals.
Catho G; Centemero NS; Catho H; Ranzani A; Balmelli C; Landelle C; Zanichelli V; Huttner BD;
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104233. PubMed ID: 32736330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of provider characteristics on the responses to medication-related decision support alerts.
Cho I; Slight SP; Nanji KC; Seger DL; Maniam N; Fiskio JM; Dykes PC; Bates DW
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Sep; 84(9):630-9. PubMed ID: 26004341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential safety gaps in order entry and automated drug alerts: a nationwide survey of VA physician self-reported practices with computerized order entry.
Spina JR; Glassman PA; Simon B; Lanto A; Lee M; Cunningham F; Good CB
Med Care; 2011 Oct; 49(10):904-10. PubMed ID: 21666510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do computerised clinical decision support systems for prescribing change practice? A systematic review of the literature (1990-2007).
Pearson SA; Moxey A; Robertson J; Hains I; Williamson M; Reeve J; Newby D
BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Aug; 9():154. PubMed ID: 19715591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physicians' responses to clinical decision support on an intensive care unit--comparison of four different alerting methods.
Scheepers-Hoeks AM; Grouls RJ; Neef C; Ackerman EW; Korsten EH
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Sep; 59(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23746663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
Robertson J; Walkom E; Pearson SA; Hains I; Williamsone M; Newby D
Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Apr; 18(2):69-87. PubMed ID: 20441116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Making pharmacogenomic-based prescribing alerts more effective: A scenario-based pilot study with physicians.
Overby CL; Devine EB; Abernethy N; McCune JS; Tarczy-Hornoch P
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Jun; 55():249-59. PubMed ID: 25957826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A critical evaluation of clinical decision support for the detection of drug-drug interactions.
Smithburger PL; Buckley MS; Bejian S; Burenheide K; Kane-Gill SL
Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2011 Nov; 10(6):871-82. PubMed ID: 21542665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Physicians' decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care.
Weingart SN; Toth M; Sands DZ; Aronson MD; Davis RB; Phillips RS
Arch Intern Med; 2003 Nov; 163(21):2625-31. PubMed ID: 14638563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A survey-based inventory of clinical decision support systems in computerised provider order entry in Swiss hospitals.
Carli-Ghabarou D; Seidling HM; Bonnabry P; Lovis C
Swiss Med Wkly; 2013; 143():w13894. PubMed ID: 24338034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychosocial determinants of physicians' acceptance of recommendations by antibiotic computerised decision support systems: A mixed methods study.
Chow A; Lye DC; Arah OA
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2015 Mar; 45(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 25434998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The medical office of the 21st century (MOXXI): effectiveness of computerized decision-making support in reducing inappropriate prescribing in primary care.
Tamblyn R; Huang A; Perreault R; Jacques A; Roy D; Hanley J; McLeod P; Laprise R
CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 12975221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the value of electronic prescribing in ambulatory care: a focus group study.
Weingart SN; Massagli M; Cyrulik A; Isaac T; Morway L; Sands DZ; Weissman JS
Int J Med Inform; 2009 Sep; 78(9):571-8. PubMed ID: 19395307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Decision Support Systems for Drug Allergy Checking: Systematic Review.
Légat L; Van Laere S; Nyssen M; Steurbaut S; Dupont AG; Cornu P
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Sep; 20(9):e258. PubMed ID: 30194058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerized decision support to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing to older emergency department patients: a randomized, controlled trial.
Terrell KM; Perkins AJ; Dexter PR; Hui SL; Callahan CM; Miller DK
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2009 Aug; 57(8):1388-94. PubMed ID: 19549022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adoption of clinical decision support systems in a developing country: Antecedents and outcomes of physician's threat to perceived professional autonomy.
Esmaeilzadeh P; Sambasivan M; Kumar N; Nezakati H
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Aug; 84(8):548-60. PubMed ID: 25920928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. User perspectives on an electronic decision-support tool performing comprehensive medication reviews - a focus group study with physicians and nurses.
Koskela T; Sandström S; Mäkinen J; Liira H
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jan; 16():6. PubMed ID: 26801630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential drug-related problems detected by electronic expert support system: physicians' views on clinical relevance.
Hammar T; Lidström B; Petersson G; Gustafson Y; Eiermann B
Int J Clin Pharm; 2015 Oct; 37(5):941-8. PubMed ID: 26047943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reasons for physician non-adherence to electronic drug alerts.
Taylor LK; Tamblyn R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1101-5. PubMed ID: 15360983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
