These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24821530)

  • 1. Repetition suppression comprises both attention-independent and attention-dependent processes.
    Hsu YF; Hämäläinen JA; Waszak F
    Neuroimage; 2014 Sep; 98():168-75. PubMed ID: 24821530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention modulates repetition effects in a context of low periodicity.
    Hsu YF; Darriba Á; Waszak F
    Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 1767():147559. PubMed ID: 34118219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human EEG very high frequency oscillations reflect the number of matches with a template in auditory short-term memory.
    Lenz D; Jeschke M; Schadow J; Naue N; Ohl FW; Herrmann CS
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():81-92. PubMed ID: 18036577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Momentary fluctuations in allocation of attention: cross-modal effects of visual task load on auditory discrimination.
    Haroush K; Hochstein S; Deouell LY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 22(7):1440-51. PubMed ID: 19580389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The auditory N1 suppression rebounds as prediction persists over time.
    Hsu YF; Hämäläinen JA; Waszak F
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():198-204. PubMed ID: 26921479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FMRI repetition suppression for voices is modulated by stimulus expectations.
    Andics A; Gál V; Vicsi K; Rudas G; Vidnyánszky Z
    Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 69():277-83. PubMed ID: 23268783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention to detail: why considering task demands is essential for single-trial analysis of BOLD correlates of the visual P1 and N1.
    Warbrick T; Arrubla J; Boers F; Neuner I; Shah NJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):529-42. PubMed ID: 24047390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus-focused attention speeds up auditory processing.
    Folyi T; Fehér B; Horváth J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 May; 84(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 22326595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal expectations modulate face image repetition suppression of early stimulus evoked event-related potentials.
    Feuerriegel D; Churches O; Coussens S; Keage HAD
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jan; 122():76-87. PubMed ID: 30468778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory filter width affects response magnitude but not frequency specificity in auditory cortex.
    Herrmann B; Henry MJ; Scharinger M; Obleser J
    Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 304():128-36. PubMed ID: 23876524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():181-90. PubMed ID: 18793621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Brain networks of bottom-up triggered and top-down controlled shifting of auditory attention.
    Salmi J; Rinne T; Koistinen S; Salonen O; Alho K
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1286():155-64. PubMed ID: 19577551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting.
    Töllner T; Gramann K; Müller HJ; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1653-69. PubMed ID: 18767917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The processing of mispredicted and unpredicted sensory inputs interact differently with attention.
    Hsu YF; Hämäläinen JA; Waszak F
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():85-91. PubMed ID: 29407593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feature-based attention affects direction-selective fMRI adaptation in hMT+.
    Weigelt S; Singer W; Kohler A
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2169-78. PubMed ID: 22875866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the role of serotonin and effort in voluntary attention: evidence of genetic variation in N1 modulation.
    Enge S; Fleischhauer M; Lesch KP; Strobel A
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 20655956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial gradients in unilateral neglect: A comparison of visual and auditory target detection with central attentional load.
    Eramudugolla R; Boyce A; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2681-92. PubMed ID: 20478321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensorial suppression of self-generated sounds and its dependence on attention.
    Saupe K; Widmann A; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Dec; 90(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 24095710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.