147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24821554)
1. [The significance of PSA density as predictive factor in Afro-Caribbean patients eligible for active surveillance by the French protocol criteria].
Loiselle A; Senechal C; Nevoux P; Benazzouz H; Bhakkan-Mambir B; Casenave J; Gourtaud G; Fofana M; Blanchet P
Prog Urol; 2014 May; 24(6):327-33. PubMed ID: 24821554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The value of PSA density for the diagnosis of prostatic cancer and for the indication of radical prostatectomy].
Doublet JD; Ciofu C; Fouret P; Gattegno B; Thibault P
Prog Urol; 1995 Apr; 5(2):211-9, 220; discussion 219-20. PubMed ID: 7536529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathological findings and prostate specific antigen outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men eligible for active surveillance--does the risk of misclassification vary according to biopsy criteria?
Ploussard G; Salomon L; Xylinas E; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):539-44. PubMed ID: 20006888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pathologic prostate cancer characteristics in patients eligible for active surveillance: a head-to-head comparison of contemporary protocols.
Iremashvili V; Pelaez L; Manoharan M; Jorda M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 22445138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of PSA density by 3 imaging modalities and its correlation with the PSA density of radical prostatectomy specimen.
Varkarakis I; Zarkadoulias A; Bourdoumis A; Chatzidarellis E; Antoniou N; Deliveliotis C
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1038-42. PubMed ID: 22196747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-risk prostate cancer patients without visible tumor (T1c) on multiparametric MRI could qualify for active surveillance candidate even if they did not meet inclusion criteria of active surveillance protocol.
Lee DH; Koo KC; Lee SH; Rha KH; Choi YD; Hong SJ; Chung BH
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 43(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 23580758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Revised Gleason grading system is a better predictor of indolent prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: retrospective clinical-pathological study on matched biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Giunchi F; Brunocilla E; Borghesi M; Rizzi S; Ricci MS; Romagnoli D; Martorana G; Schiavina R; Fiorentino M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2014 Oct; 12(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 24583160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single small focus of prostate adenocarcinoma (< or = 1 mm and too small for grading) and clinical significant disease after radical prostatectomy.
Taverna G; Colombo P; Seveso M; Giusti G; Piccinelli A; Benetti A; Graziotti P
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2006 Jun; 78(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 16929604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Roberts SG; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Zincke H
Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 11393495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio as a predictor of non-organ-confined prostate cancer (stage pT3).
Aus G; Becker C; Lilja H; Khatami A; Pihl CG; Hugosson J
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 14675918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?
van Oort IM; Schout BM; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen CA; Witjes JA
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 16046051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical characteristics and pathologic findings in patients eligible for active surveillance who underwent radical prostatectomy.
Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Cussenot O; Bitker MO; Haertig A; Rouprêt M
Urol Oncol; 2012; 30(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 20884256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The role of prostate specific antigen in diagnosis of localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Nara Uro-Oncology Research Group].
Hirao Y; Ozono S; Kagebayashi Y; Yoshi M; Tani Y; Uemura H; Momose H; Okajima E
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1996 Oct; 42(10):795-804. PubMed ID: 8951478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pathological stage distribution in patients treated with radical prostatectomy reflecting the need for protocol-based active surveillance: results from a contemporary European patient cohort.
Seiler D; Randazzo M; Klotz L; Grobholz R; Baumgartner M; Isbarn H; Recker F; Kwiatkowski M
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 22093744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
