1289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24821756)
1. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.
Freeman S; Eddy SL; McDonough M; Smith MK; Okoroafor N; Jordt H; Wenderoth MP
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jun; 111(23):8410-5. PubMed ID: 24821756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math.
Theobald EJ; Hill MJ; Tran E; Agrawal S; Arroyo EN; Behling S; Chambwe N; Cintrón DL; Cooper JD; Dunster G; Grummer JA; Hennessey K; Hsiao J; Iranon N; Jones L; Jordt H; Keller M; Lacey ME; Littlefield CE; Lowe A; Newman S; Okolo V; Olroyd S; Peecook BR; Pickett SB; Slager DL; Caviedes-Solis IW; Stanchak KE; Sundaravardan V; Valdebenito C; Williams CR; Zinsli K; Freeman S
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(12):6476-6483. PubMed ID: 32152114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes.
Eddy SL; Converse M; Wenderoth MP
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015; 14(2):14:ar23. PubMed ID: 26033871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limitations in experimental design mean that the jury is still out on lecturing.
Hora MT
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(30):E3024. PubMed ID: 25024170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Is it the intervention or the students? using linear regression to control for student characteristics in undergraduate STEM education research.
Theobald R; Freeman S
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 24591502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message.
Wieman CE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jun; 111(23):8319-20. PubMed ID: 24853505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reply to Hora: Meta-analytic techniques are designed to accommodate variation in implementation.
Freeman S; Eddy SL; Jordt H; Smith MK; Wenderoth MP
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(30):E3025. PubMed ID: 25215374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Roles matter: Graduate student perceptions of active learning in the STEM courses they take and those they teach.
Patrick L; Howell LA; Wischusen EW
Sci Prog; 2021 Oct; 104(4):368504211033500. PubMed ID: 34843418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "What Will I Experience in My College STEM Courses?" An Investigation of Student Predictions about Instructional Practices in Introductory Courses.
Meaders CL; Toth ES; Lane AK; Shuman JK; Couch BA; Stains M; Stetzer MR; Vinson E; Smith MK
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Dec; 18(4):ar60. PubMed ID: 31730385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changing academic culture to improve undergraduate STEM education.
Suchman EL
Trends Microbiol; 2014 Dec; 22(12):657-9. PubMed ID: 25449051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FAIL Is Not a Four-Letter Word: A Theoretical Framework for Exploring Undergraduate Students' Approaches to Academic Challenge and Responses to Failure in STEM Learning Environments.
Henry MA; Shorter S; Charkoudian L; Heemstra JM; Corwin LA
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 18(1):ar11. PubMed ID: 30821602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What really impacts the use of active learning in undergraduate STEM education? Results from a national survey of chemistry, mathematics, and physics instructors.
Apkarian N; Henderson C; Stains M; Raker J; Johnson E; Dancy M
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0247544. PubMed ID: 33630945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does Applied STEM Course Taking Link to STEM Outcomes for High School Students With Learning Disabilities?
Gottfried MA; Sublett C
J Learn Disabil; 2018; 51(3):250-267. PubMed ID: 28170283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM.
Solomon ED; Repice MD; Mutambuki JM; Leonard DA; Cohen CA; Luo J; Frey RF
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2018 Jun; 17(2):ar30. PubMed ID: 29786474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): a new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices.
Smith MK; Jones FH; Gilbert SL; Wieman CE
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 24297289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reframing Achievement Setbacks: A Motivation Intervention to Improve 8-Year Graduation Rates for Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Fields.
Hamm JM; Perry RP; Chipperfield JG; Hladkyj S; Parker PC; Weiner B
Psychol Sci; 2020 Jun; 31(6):623-633. PubMed ID: 32374639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Student Learning Dispositions: Multidimensional Profiles Highlight Important Differences among Undergraduate STEM Honors Thesis Writers.
Dowd JE; Thompson RJ; Schiff L; Haas K; Hohmann C; Roy C; Meck W; Bruno J; Reynolds JA
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Jun; 18(2):ar28. PubMed ID: 31150321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP): A quantitative method for characterizing teacher discourse moves in undergraduate STEM learning environments.
Kranzfelder P; Bankers-Fulbright JL; García-Ojeda ME; Melloy M; Mohammed S; Warfa AM
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219019. PubMed ID: 31314756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Welcoming Deaf Students into STEM: Recommendations for University Science Education.
Braun DC; Clark MD; Marchut AE; Solomon CM; Majocha M; Davenport Z; Kushalnagar RS; Listman J; Hauser PC; Gormally C
CBE Life Sci Educ; 2018 Sep; 17(3):es10. PubMed ID: 30142044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of passive and active learning on student preference and performance in an undergraduate basic science course.
Minhas PS; Ghosh A; Swanzy L
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(4):200-7. PubMed ID: 22434661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
