These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24822021)

  • 1. An arms race between producers and scroungers can drive the evolution of social cognition.
    Arbilly M; Weissman DB; Feldman MW; Grodzinski U
    Behav Ecol; 2014 May; 25(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 24822021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An asymmetric producer-scrounger game: body size and the social foraging behavior of coho salmon.
    Phillips JA; Peacock SJ; Bateman A; Bartlett M; Lewis MA; Krkošek M
    Theor Ecol; 2018; 11(4):417-431. PubMed ID: 30931016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Food-caching chickadees with specialized spatial cognition do not use scrounging as a stable strategy when learning a spatial task.
    Heinen VK; Pitera AM; Sonnenberg BR; Branch CL; Benedict LM; Welklin JF; Whitenack LE; Bridge ES; Pravosudov VV
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Jul; 290(2002):20230900. PubMed ID: 37434529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stable producer-scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour.
    Aplin LM; Morand-Ferron J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Apr; 284(1852):. PubMed ID: 28404775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The patch distributed producer-scrounger game.
    Ohtsuka Y; Toquenaga Y
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 19501599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the importance of accounting for alternative foraging tactics when assessing cognitive performance in wild animals.
    Vernouillet A
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2474-2477. PubMed ID: 34734419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skill trade-offs promote persistent individual differences and specialized tactics.
    Dubois F
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Oct; 13(10):e10578. PubMed ID: 37809359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Producers, scroungers and the price of a free meal.
    Ranta E; Peuhkuri N; Hirvonen H; Barnard CJ
    Anim Behav; 1998 Mar; 55(3):737-44. PubMed ID: 9514673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consequences of multiple simultaneous opportunities to exploit others' efforts on free riding.
    Dubois F; Richard-Dionne É
    Ecol Evol; 2020 May; 10(10):4343-4351. PubMed ID: 32489601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Persistent producer-scrounger relationships in bats.
    Harten L; Matalon Y; Galli N; Navon H; Dor R; Yovel Y
    Sci Adv; 2018 Feb; 4(2):e1603293. PubMed ID: 29441356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognition and covariance in the producer-scrounger game.
    Reichert MS; Morand-Ferron J; Kulahci IG; Firth JA; Davidson GL; Crofts SJ; Quinn JL
    J Anim Ecol; 2021 Nov; 90(11):2497-2509. PubMed ID: 34091901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Daily Patterns of Optimal Producer and Scrounger Use under Predation Hazard: A State-Dependent Dynamic Game Analysis.
    Barta Z; Giraldeau LA
    Am Nat; 2000 Apr; 155(4):570-582. PubMed ID: 10753082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evolutionary perspective on social inequality and health disparities: Insights from the producer-scrounger game.
    Wells JCK
    Evol Med Public Health; 2023; 11(1):294-308. PubMed ID: 37680454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of exploration on the use of producer-scrounger tactics.
    Kurvers RH; Hamblin S; Giraldeau LA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49400. PubMed ID: 23185327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Co-evolution of learning complexity and social foraging strategies.
    Arbilly M; Motro U; Feldman MW; Lotem A
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Dec; 267(4):573-81. PubMed ID: 20858503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Producers and scroungers: feeding-type composition changes with group size in a socially foraging spider.
    Dumke M; Herberstein ME; Schneider JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1828):. PubMed ID: 27075253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Producing and scrounging can have stabilizing effects at multiple levels of organization.
    Vickery WL
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar; 10(6):2969-2978. PubMed ID: 32211169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning in a game context: strategy choice by some keeps learning from evolving in others.
    Dubois F; Morand-Ferron J; Giraldeau LA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Dec; 277(1700):3609-16. PubMed ID: 20573623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Switching spatial scale reveals dominance-dependent social foraging tactics in a wild primate.
    Lee AEG; Cowlishaw G
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3462. PubMed ID: 28674647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coevolution of adaptive technology, maladaptive culture and population size in a producer-scrounger game.
    Lehmann L; Feldman MW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Nov; 276(1674):3853-62. PubMed ID: 19692409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.