These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24822196)
21. An update on laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Row D; Weiser MR Cancer Control; 2010 Jan; 17(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 20010515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery by a colon lifting-up technique that decreases the number of access ports: comparison by propensity scoring of short-term and long-term outcomes with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery. Fujii S; Watanabe K; Ota M; Watanabe J; Ichikawa Y; Yamagishi S; Tatsumi K; Suwa H; Kunisaki C; Taguri M; Morita S; Endo I Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Feb; 22(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 22318058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Totally-laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer: are outcomes different? Ng JL; Lai JH; Li HH; Tan EP; Tang CL ANZ J Surg; 2018 Dec; 88(12):E818-E823. PubMed ID: 30211478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Laurent C; Leblanc F; Wütrich P; Scheffler M; Rullier E Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 19561481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of the complication rates between laparoscopic colectomy and laparoscopic low anterior resection. Yamamoto S; Fujita S; Akasu T; Moriya Y Surg Endosc; 2004 Oct; 18(10):1447-51. PubMed ID: 15791367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Controversies in Surgical Oncology: Does the Minimally Invasive Approach for Rectal Cancer Provide Equivalent Oncologic Outcomes Compared with the Open Approach? Cleary RK; Morris AM; Chang GJ; Halverson AL Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3587-3595. PubMed ID: 30187281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Standardised approach to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective multi-centre analysis. Bullock M; Nasir IUI; Hemandas A; Qureshi T; Figueiredo N; Heald R; Parvaiz A Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2019 Aug; 404(5):547-555. PubMed ID: 31377857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in High-Volume Surgical Centers: Long-Term Outcomes from the LAPCOLON Group Trial. Huscher CG; Bretagnol F; Corcione F World J Surg; 2015 Aug; 39(8):2045-51. PubMed ID: 25820910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Erguner I; Aytac E; Boler DE; Atalar B; Baca B; Karahasanoglu T; Hamzaoglu I; Uras C Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Jun; 23(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 23752000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015). Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Memon S; Heriot AG; Murphy DG; Bressel M; Lynch AC Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):2095-101. PubMed ID: 22350601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a review. Poon JT; Law WL Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3038-47. PubMed ID: 19641971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of increasing body mass index on laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer. Bell S; Kong JC; Wale R; Staples M; Oliva K; Wilkins S; Mc Murrick P; Warrier SK Colorectal Dis; 2018 Sep; 20(9):778-788. PubMed ID: 29577556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and functional outcome of endoscopic transanal proctectomy versus laparoscopic proctectomy for low-lying rectal cancer (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL): rationale and design. Lelong B; de Chaisemartin C; Meillat H; Cournier S; Boher JM; Genre D; Karoui M; Tuech JJ; Delpero JR; BMC Cancer; 2017 Apr; 17(1):253. PubMed ID: 28399840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP. Greenblatt DY; Rajamanickam V; Pugely AJ; Heise CP; Foley EF; Kennedy GD J Am Coll Surg; 2011 May; 212(5):844-54. PubMed ID: 21414814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients. Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic resection of transverse colon cancer at splenic flexure: technical aspects and results. Okuda J; Yamamoto M; Tanaka K; Masubuchi S; Uchiyama K Updates Surg; 2016 Mar; 68(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 27015933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. There is no difference in outcome between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis on short- and long-term oncologic outcomes. Pędziwiatr M; Małczak P; Mizera M; Witowski J; Torbicz G; Major P; Pisarska M; Wysocki M; Budzyński A Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Aug; 21(8):595-604. PubMed ID: 28795243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laparoscopy Versus Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center Initial Experience. Ferrara F; Piagnerelli R; Scheiterle M; Di Mare G; Gnoni P; Marrelli D; Roviello F Surg Innov; 2016 Aug; 23(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 26721500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]