These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24825129)

  • 1. Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects with an energetic or informational masker in bilateral and bimodal CI users.
    Pyschny V; Landwehr M; Hahn M; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Meister H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1942-60. PubMed ID: 24825129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial Release From Informational and Energetic Masking in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    D'Onofrio K; Richards V; Gifford R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Nov; 63(11):3816-3833. PubMed ID: 33049147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
    Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
    Jones JA; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear.
    Gifford RH; Dorman MF; Sheffield SW; Teece K; Olund AP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 24356514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation.
    Müller V; Lang-Roth R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3343-3356. PubMed ID: 34310192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural summation, binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit in bimodal and bilateral adult cochlear implant users.
    de Graaff F; Eikelboom RH; Sucher C; Kramer SE; Smits C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Sep; 22(5):245-256. PubMed ID: 33832408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bimodal hearing and speech perception with a competing talker.
    Pyschny V; Landwehr M; Hahn M; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1400-15. PubMed ID: 21498577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Eskridge EN; Galvin JJ; Aronoff JM; Li T; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):800-10. PubMed ID: 22223890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A meta-analysis to compare speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation.
    Schafer EC; Amlani AM; Paiva D; Nozari L; Verret S
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 50(12):871-80. PubMed ID: 22103439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L; Buss E; Bowdrie K
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
    Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Voice fundamental frequency differences and speech recognition with noise and speech maskers in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Walger M; Lang-Roth R; Müller V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):EL19. PubMed ID: 32007021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Head Shadow, Summation, and Squelch in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users With Linked Automatic Gain Controls.
    Bakal TA; Milvae KD; Chen C; Goupell MJ
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211018147. PubMed ID: 34057387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining energetic and informational masking for speech identification.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Gallun FJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):982-92. PubMed ID: 16158654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.