These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24825305)

  • 1. Whose statistical reasoning is facilitated by a causal structure intervention?
    McNair S; Feeney A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):258-64. PubMed ID: 24825305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Thinking Dispositions, General Ability, Numeracy, and Instructional Set on Judgments and Decision-Making.
    Klaczynski PA; Felmban W
    Psychol Rep; 2020 Apr; 123(2):341-370. PubMed ID: 30550725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning?
    McNair S; Feeney A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):625-45. PubMed ID: 23931633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Causal explanation improves judgment under uncertainty, but rarely in a Bayesian way.
    Hayes BK; Ngo J; Hawkins GE; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):112-131. PubMed ID: 28905276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causality in thought.
    Sloman SA; Lagnado D
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2015 Jan; 66():223-47. PubMed ID: 25061673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the cognitive reflection test as a measure of intuition/reflection, numeracy, and insight problem solving, and the implications for understanding real-world judgments and beliefs.
    Patel N; Baker SG; Scherer LD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Dec; 148(12):2129-2153. PubMed ID: 31021149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactivity fosters Bayesian reasoning without instruction.
    Vallée-Tourangeau G; Abadie M; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):581-603. PubMed ID: 26030173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):577-591. PubMed ID: 28383994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A set for relational reasoning: Facilitation of algebraic modeling by a fraction task.
    DeWolf M; Bassok M; Holyoak KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Dec; 152():351-366. PubMed ID: 27522528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Associations between conceptual reasoning, problem solving, and adaptive ability in high-functioning autism.
    Williams DL; Mazefsky CA; Walker JD; Minshew NJ; Goldstein G
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2014 Nov; 44(11):2908-20. PubMed ID: 25099486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information.
    Meder B; Mayrhofer R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():54-84. PubMed ID: 28623726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Children's quantitative Bayesian inferences from natural frequencies and number of chances.
    Pighin S; Girotto V; Tentori K
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():164-175. PubMed ID: 28692831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reasoners consider alternative causes in predictive and diagnostic reasoning.
    Aßfalg A; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2188-2208. PubMed ID: 30998074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Context-Dependent Bayesian Account for Causal-Based Categorization.
    Marchant N; Quillien T; Chaigneau SE
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 47(1):e13240. PubMed ID: 36680423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination.
    Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When and for whom do frequencies facilitate performance? On the role of numerical literacy.
    Hill WT; Brase GL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2343-68. PubMed ID: 22630143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining the implicit negations effect in conditional inference: Experience, probabilities, and contrast sets.
    Vance J; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):354-384. PubMed ID: 32881565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty.
    Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are Jurors Intuitive Statisticians? Bayesian Causal Reasoning in Legal Contexts.
    Shengelia T; Lagnado D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():519262. PubMed ID: 33613348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.