These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24825306)

  • 1. Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay.
    Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 24825306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-based loss in visual short-term memory is from trace decay, not temporal distinctiveness.
    Ricker TJ; Spiegel LR; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1510-23. PubMed ID: 24884646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The loss of short-term visual representations over time: decay or temporal distinctiveness?
    Mercer T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2281-8. PubMed ID: 25314045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the sources of forgetting in working memory: The test of competing hypotheses.
    Barrouillet P; Uittenhove K; Lucidi A; Langerock N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1714-1733. PubMed ID: 28726552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The representational consequences of intentional forgetting: Impairments to both the probability and fidelity of long-term memory.
    Fawcett JM; Lawrence MA; Taylor TL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jan; 145(1):56-81. PubMed ID: 26709589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The short- and long-term consequences of directed forgetting in a working memory task.
    Festini SB; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Memory; 2013; 21(7):763-77. PubMed ID: 23294433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.
    Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time-related decay or interference-based forgetting in working memory?
    Portrat S; Barrouillet P; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1561-4. PubMed ID: 18980415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No age deficits in the ability to use attention to improve visual working memory.
    Souza AS
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Aug; 31(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 27253868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do working memory-driven attention shifts speed up visual awareness?
    Pan Y; Cheng QP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2425-33. PubMed ID: 21837542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forgetting in immediate serial recall: decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference?
    Oberauer K; Lewandowsky S
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jul; 115(3):544-76. PubMed ID: 18729591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Loss of visual working memory within seconds: the combined use of refreshable and non-refreshable features.
    Ricker TJ; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1355-68. PubMed ID: 20804281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.
    Shipstead Z; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):277-89. PubMed ID: 22612165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method matters: systematic effects of testing procedure on visual working memory sensitivity.
    Makovski T; Watson LM; Koutstaal W; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1466-79. PubMed ID: 20854011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual working memory is disrupted by covert verbal retrieval.
    Ricker TJ; Cowan N; Morey CC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):516-21. PubMed ID: 20702871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The plateau in mnemonic resolution across large set sizes indicates discrete resource limits in visual working memory.
    Anderson DE; Awh E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):891-910. PubMed ID: 22477058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-task interference in visual working memory: a limitation in storage capacity but not in encoding or retrieval.
    Fougnie D; Marois R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1831-41. PubMed ID: 19933566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial transposition gradients in visual working memory.
    Rerko L; Oberauer K; Lin HY
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 23663175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The visual nonverbal memory trace is fragile when actively maintained, but endures passively for tens of seconds.
    McKeown D; Mercer T; Bugajska K; Duffy P; Barker E
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):212-225. PubMed ID: 31873852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory.
    Ueno T; Allen RJ; Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Saito S
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 21264628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.