These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24825693)

  • 1. IT-benchmarking of clinical workflows: concept, implementation, and evaluation.
    Thye J; Straede MC; Liebe JD; Hübner U
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 198():116-24. PubMed ID: 24825693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing a Workflow Composite Score to Measure Clinical Information Logistics. A Top-down Approach.
    Liebe JD; Hübner U; Straede MC; Thye J
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(5):424-33. PubMed ID: 26419492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing and Trialling an independent, scalable and repeatable IT-benchmarking procedure for healthcare organisations.
    Liebe JD; Hübner U
    Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(4):360-9. PubMed ID: 23877646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A KPI framework for process-based benchmarking of hospital information systems.
    Jahn F; Winter A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():542-6. PubMed ID: 21893808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring effectiveness of electronic medical records systems: towards building a composite index for benchmarking hospitals.
    Otieno GO; Hinako T; Motohiro A; Daisuke K; Keiko N
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Oct; 77(10):657-69. PubMed ID: 18313352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementing standards for the interoperability among healthcare providers in the public regionalized Healthcare Information System of the Lombardy Region.
    Barbarito F; Pinciroli F; Mason J; Marceglia S; Mazzola L; Bonacina S
    J Biomed Inform; 2012 Aug; 45(4):736-45. PubMed ID: 22285983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding latent structures of clinical information logistics: A bottom-up approach for model building and validating the workflow composite score.
    Esdar M; Hübner U; Liebe JD; Hüsers J; Thye J
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():210-220. PubMed ID: 27919379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation center accreditation and programmatic benchmarks: a review for emergency medicine.
    Fernandez R; Wang E; Vozenilek JA; Hayden E; McLaughlin S; Godwin SA; Griswold-Theodorson S; Davenport M; Gordon JA;
    Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1093-103. PubMed ID: 21040111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying achievable benchmarks of care: concepts and methodology.
    Kiefe CI; Weissman NW; Allison JJ; Farmer R; Weaver M; Williams OD
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1998 Oct; 10(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 9828034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evidence-based approach to benchmarking the fairness of health-sector reform in developing countries.
    Daniels N; Flores W; Pannarunothai S; Ndumbe PN; Bryant JH; Ngulube TJ; Wang Y
    Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Jul; 83(7):534-40. PubMed ID: 16175828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation and optimization of virtual screening workflows with DEKOIS 2.0--a public library of challenging docking benchmark sets.
    Bauer MR; Ibrahim TM; Vogel SM; Boeckler FM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1447-62. PubMed ID: 23705874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preparing chief information officers for the clinical information systems environment.
    Valenta AL; Mendola RA; Dieter M; Panko WB
    Acad Med; 1999 May; 74(5):511-5. PubMed ID: 10353282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benchmarking specialty hospitals, a scoping review on theory and practice.
    Wind A; van Harten WH
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Apr; 17(1):245. PubMed ID: 28372574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PEWO: a collection of workflows to benchmark phylogenetic placement.
    Linard B; Romashchenko N; Pardi F; Rivals E
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Jan; 36(21):5264-5266. PubMed ID: 32697844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance, benchmarking, assessment and mutual international recognition of qualifications.
    Hobson R; Rolland S; Rotgans J; Schoonheim-Klein M; Best H; Chomyszyn-Gajewska M; Dymock D; Essop R; Hupp J; Kundzina R; Love R; Memon RA; Moola M; Neumann L; Ozden N; Roth K; Samwel P; Villavicencio J; Wright P; Harzer W
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2008 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():92-100. PubMed ID: 18289272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When it comes to information systems, too often the blind lead the blind.
    Healthc Benchmarks; 1997 Apr; 4(4):41-4. PubMed ID: 10176233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The necessity of measurement.
    Dudden RF
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2008; 27(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 19042712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe.
    Klazinga N; Fischer C; ten Asbroek A
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():38-47. PubMed ID: 21737528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Process evaluation of a tailored multifaceted feedback program to improve the quality of intensive care by using quality indicators.
    de Vos Maartje LG; van der Veer SN; Graafmans WC; de Keizer NF; Jager KJ; Westert GP; van der Voort PH
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Mar; 22(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 23362504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality assessment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a running nationwide Austrian benchmarking project after 5 years of implementation.
    Kapral C; Mühlberger A; Wewalka F; Duller C; Knoflach P; Schreiber F;
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Dec; 24(12):1447-54. PubMed ID: 23114747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.