These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24825821)

  • 1. On regression adjustment for the propensity score.
    Vansteelandt S; Daniel RM
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4053-72. PubMed ID: 24825821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias.
    Pressler TR; Kaizar EE
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3552-68. PubMed ID: 23553373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Covariate adjustment in subgroup analyses of randomized clinical trials: A propensity score approach.
    Yang S; Li F; Thomas LE; Li F
    Clin Trials; 2021 Oct; 18(5):570-581. PubMed ID: 34269087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity Score: an Alternative Method of Analyzing Treatment Effects.
    Kuss O; Blettner M; Börgermann J
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2016 Sep; 113(35-36):597-603. PubMed ID: 27658473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
    Hattori S; Henmi M
    Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity scores based methods for estimating average treatment effect and average treatment effect among treated: A comparative study.
    Abdia Y; Kulasekera KB; Datta S; Boakye M; Kong M
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):967-985. PubMed ID: 28436047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores in estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated: a simulation study.
    Leacy FP; Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(20):3488-508. PubMed ID: 24151187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved inference for doubly robust estimators of heterogeneous treatment effects.
    Shin H; Antonelli J
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3140-3152. PubMed ID: 36745745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variance reduction in randomised trials by inverse probability weighting using the propensity score.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A; White IR
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(5):721-37. PubMed ID: 24114884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Propensity-score-based Fine Stratification Approach for Confounding Adjustment When Exposure Is Infrequent.
    Desai RJ; Rothman KJ; Bateman BT; Hernandez-Diaz S; Huybrechts KF
    Epidemiology; 2017 Mar; 28(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 27922533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement for patients with multimorbidities: a cohort study using propensity score stratification and inverse probability weighting.
    Prats-Uribe A; Kolovos S; Berencsi K; Carr A; Judge A; Silman A; Arden N; Petersen I; Douglas IJ; Wilkinson JM; Murray D; Valderas JM; Beard DJ; Lamb SE; Ali MS; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Strauss VY; Prieto-Alhambra D
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Nov; 25(66):1-126. PubMed ID: 34812138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction to propensity scores.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A
    Respirology; 2014 Jul; 19(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 24889820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.