These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24828752)

  • 21. The search for causal traits of speciation: Divergent female mate preferences target male courtship song, not pheromones, in Drosophila athabasca species complex.
    Yukilevich R; Harvey T; Nguyen S; Kehlbeck J; Park A
    Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 26831347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection.
    Van Homrigh A; Higgie M; McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Curr Biol; 2007 Mar; 17(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 17306541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative genetics of female mate preferences in an ancestral and a novel environment.
    Delcourt M; Blows MW; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2010 Sep; 64(9):2758-66. PubMed ID: 20482612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing complex fitness surfaces: among-population variation in mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2008 Apr; 171(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 18254685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reduced genetic variance among high fitness individuals: inferring stabilizing selection on male sexual displays in Drosophila serrata.
    Sztepanacz JL; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Oct; 66(10):3101-10. PubMed ID: 23025601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Male choice generates stabilizing sexual selection on a female fecundity correlate.
    Chenoweth SF; Petfield D; Doughty P; Blows MW
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Sep; 20(5):1745-50. PubMed ID: 17714292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the evolution of heightened condition dependence of male sexual displays.
    Gosden TP; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 24(3):685-92. PubMed ID: 21214657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Natural variation in the strength and direction of male mating preferences for female pheromones in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Pischedda A; Shahandeh MP; Cochrane WG; Cochrane VA; Turner TL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87509. PubMed ID: 24489930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interaction between females and males grapevine moth Lobesia botrana modifies further mating preference.
    Lorrain-Soligon L; Muller K; Delaby C; Thiéry D; Moreau J
    J Insect Physiol; 2024 Jul; 156():104668. PubMed ID: 38942138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Male mate recognition via cuticular hydrocarbons facilitates sexual isolation between sympatric leaf beetle sister species.
    Zhang B; Xue HJ; Song KQ; Liu J; Li WZ; Nie RE; Yang XK
    J Insect Physiol; 2014 Nov; 70():15-21. PubMed ID: 25172230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition.
    Blows MW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jun; 269(1496):1113-8. PubMed ID: 12061953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Post-mating shift towards longer-chain cuticular hydrocarbons drastically reduces female attractiveness to males in a digger wasp.
    Polidori C; Giordani I; Wurdack M; Tormos J; Asís JD; Schmitt T
    J Insect Physiol; 2017 Jul; 100():119-127. PubMed ID: 28477982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mate choice opportunity leads to shorter offspring development time in a desert insect.
    Havens JA; Orzack SH; Etges WJ
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Jun; 24(6):1317-24. PubMed ID: 21481056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spider sex pheromones: emission, reception, structures, and functions.
    Gaskett AC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Feb; 82(1):27-48. PubMed ID: 17313523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 22276541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preference status does not indicate intrinsic quality differences in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Kim YK; Weber MB; Anderson WW; Gowaty PA
    Integr Zool; 2010 Sep; 5(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 21392338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Crowd control: sex ratio affects sexually selected cuticular hydrocarbons in male Drosophila serrata.
    Gershman SN; Rundle HD
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Mar; 30(3):583-590. PubMed ID: 27981675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.