These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24829124)

  • 1. The effect of concrete supplements on metacognitive regulation during learning and open-book test taking.
    Ackerman R; Leiser D
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2014 Jun; 84(Pt 2):329-48. PubMed ID: 24829124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is comprehension of problem solutions resistant to misleading heuristic cues?
    Ackerman R; Leiser D; Shpigelman M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 May; 143(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 23542811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence judgments in real classroom settings: monitoring performance in different types of tests.
    de Carvalho Filho MK
    Int J Psychol; 2009 Apr; 44(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 22029451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harmful effects of preexisting inappropriate highlighting on reading comprehension and metacognitive accuracy.
    Gier VS; Kreiner DS; Natz-Gonzalez A
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):287-300. PubMed ID: 19650523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metacognitive regulation of text learning: on screen versus on paper.
    Ackerman R; Goldsmith M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Mar; 17(1):18-32. PubMed ID: 21443378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking.
    Krebs SS; Roebers CM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):325-40. PubMed ID: 20100399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test.
    Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):836-52. PubMed ID: 21995673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition.
    Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognitive monitoring and control processes involved in primary school children's test performance.
    Roebers CM; Schmid C; Roderer T
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2009 Dec; 79(Pt 4):749-67. PubMed ID: 19341532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviours: relations with learning-related emotions and academic success.
    Putwain D; Sander P; Larkin D
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2013 Dec; 83(Pt 4):633-50. PubMed ID: 24175686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Presence and place of main ideas and examples in study texts.
    Beishuizen J; Asscher J; Prinsen F; Elshout-Mohr M
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2003 Sep; 73(Pt 3):291-316. PubMed ID: 14672145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test expectancy affects metacomprehension accuracy.
    Thiede KW; Wiley J; Griffin TD
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2011 Jun; 81(Pt 2):264-73. PubMed ID: 21542818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Metacognitive Study and Learning Strategies, and Behavioral Study and Learning Strategies in Predicting Academic Success in Students With and Without a History of Reading Difficulties.
    Chevalier TM; Parrila R; Ritchie KC; Deacon SH
    J Learn Disabil; 2017 Jan; 50(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 26025926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metacomprehension judgements reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text.
    Serra MJ; Dunlosky J
    Memory; 2010 Oct; 18(7):698-711. PubMed ID: 20730677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of activating prior topic and metacognitive knowledge on text comprehension scores.
    Kostons D; van der Werf G
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):264-75. PubMed ID: 25752451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-generated explanations on the question demands are not always helpful.
    Cerdán R; Gilabert R; Vidal-Abarca E
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E26. PubMed ID: 23866220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding abstract expository texts.
    Beishuizen J; Stoutjesdijk E; Spuijbroek S; Bouwmeester S; van der Geest H
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2002 Jun; 72(Pt 2):279-97. PubMed ID: 12028613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students' mathematical reasoning.
    Mevarech ZR; Kramarski B
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2003 Dec; 73(Pt 4):449-71. PubMed ID: 14713372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impacts of comprehensive reading instruction on diverse outcomes of low- and high-achieving readers.
    Guthrie JT; McRae A; Coddington CS; Lutz Klauda S; Wigfield A; Barbosa P
    J Learn Disabil; 2009; 42(3):195-214. PubMed ID: 19264929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: the roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project-based learning.
    Cheng RW; Lam SF; Chan JC
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2008 Jun; 78(Pt 2):205-21. PubMed ID: 17588293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.