BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24829124)

  • 1. The effect of concrete supplements on metacognitive regulation during learning and open-book test taking.
    Ackerman R; Leiser D
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2014 Jun; 84(Pt 2):329-48. PubMed ID: 24829124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is comprehension of problem solutions resistant to misleading heuristic cues?
    Ackerman R; Leiser D; Shpigelman M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 May; 143(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 23542811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence judgments in real classroom settings: monitoring performance in different types of tests.
    de Carvalho Filho MK
    Int J Psychol; 2009 Apr; 44(2):93-108. PubMed ID: 22029451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harmful effects of preexisting inappropriate highlighting on reading comprehension and metacognitive accuracy.
    Gier VS; Kreiner DS; Natz-Gonzalez A
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):287-300. PubMed ID: 19650523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metacognitive regulation of text learning: on screen versus on paper.
    Ackerman R; Goldsmith M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Mar; 17(1):18-32. PubMed ID: 21443378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children's strategic regulation, metacognitive monitoring, and control processes during test taking.
    Krebs SS; Roebers CM
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2010 Sep; 80(Pt 3):325-40. PubMed ID: 20100399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test.
    Agarwal PK; Roediger HL
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):836-52. PubMed ID: 21995673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition.
    Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognitive monitoring and control processes involved in primary school children's test performance.
    Roebers CM; Schmid C; Roderer T
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2009 Dec; 79(Pt 4):749-67. PubMed ID: 19341532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Academic self-efficacy in study-related skills and behaviours: relations with learning-related emotions and academic success.
    Putwain D; Sander P; Larkin D
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2013 Dec; 83(Pt 4):633-50. PubMed ID: 24175686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Presence and place of main ideas and examples in study texts.
    Beishuizen J; Asscher J; Prinsen F; Elshout-Mohr M
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2003 Sep; 73(Pt 3):291-316. PubMed ID: 14672145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Test expectancy affects metacomprehension accuracy.
    Thiede KW; Wiley J; Griffin TD
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2011 Jun; 81(Pt 2):264-73. PubMed ID: 21542818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Metacognitive Study and Learning Strategies, and Behavioral Study and Learning Strategies in Predicting Academic Success in Students With and Without a History of Reading Difficulties.
    Chevalier TM; Parrila R; Ritchie KC; Deacon SH
    J Learn Disabil; 2017 Jan; 50(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 26025926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metacomprehension judgements reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text.
    Serra MJ; Dunlosky J
    Memory; 2010 Oct; 18(7):698-711. PubMed ID: 20730677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of activating prior topic and metacognitive knowledge on text comprehension scores.
    Kostons D; van der Werf G
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):264-75. PubMed ID: 25752451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-generated explanations on the question demands are not always helpful.
    Cerdán R; Gilabert R; Vidal-Abarca E
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E26. PubMed ID: 23866220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding abstract expository texts.
    Beishuizen J; Stoutjesdijk E; Spuijbroek S; Bouwmeester S; van der Geest H
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2002 Jun; 72(Pt 2):279-97. PubMed ID: 12028613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students' mathematical reasoning.
    Mevarech ZR; Kramarski B
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2003 Dec; 73(Pt 4):449-71. PubMed ID: 14713372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impacts of comprehensive reading instruction on diverse outcomes of low- and high-achieving readers.
    Guthrie JT; McRae A; Coddington CS; Lutz Klauda S; Wigfield A; Barbosa P
    J Learn Disabil; 2009; 42(3):195-214. PubMed ID: 19264929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: the roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project-based learning.
    Cheng RW; Lam SF; Chan JC
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2008 Jun; 78(Pt 2):205-21. PubMed ID: 17588293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.