These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24829273)

  • 1. To P or not to P: that is the question.
    Boyd JC; Annesley TM
    Clin Chem; 2014 Jul; 60(7):909-10. PubMed ID: 24829273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can we screen for pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination in epidemiologic studies?
    Barber MD; Neubauer NL; Klein-Olarte V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 195(4):942-8. PubMed ID: 16681989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the probability of negative events.
    Harris AJ; Corner A; Hahn U
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 19036359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction.
    Wang Z; Busemeyer JR
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):689-710. PubMed ID: 24027203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reframing the debate: A question of probability, not of likelihood ratio.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Taroni F; Aitken C
    Sci Justice; 2016 Sep; 56(5):392-396. PubMed ID: 27702458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contingency bias in probability judgement may arise from ambiguity regarding additional causes.
    Mitchell CJ; Griffiths O; More P; Lovibond PF
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1675-86. PubMed ID: 23350876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A research feasibility assessment of regulatory information systems capacities for investigation of epidemiologic factors in pseudorabies.
    Miller LE; Cowen P; Honeycutt TL; Morrow WE; Hueston WD
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1994 Oct; 205(8):1133-9. PubMed ID: 7890570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective and subjective probability in gene expression.
    Velasco JD
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2012 Sep; 110(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 22503883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The probability of parallel evolution.
    Orr HA
    Evolution; 2005 Jan; 59(1):216-20. PubMed ID: 15792240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining the probability of an important difference in bioavailability.
    Rodda BE; Davis RL
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1980 Aug; 28(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 6994991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of probability analysis in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Detrano R; Marcondos G; Froelicher VF
    Chest; 1988 Aug; 94(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 3396419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When to include polymyxins in the empirical antibiotic regimen in critically ill patients with fever? A decision analysis approach.
    Falagas ME; Rafailidis PI
    Shock; 2007 Jun; 27(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 17505298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conformity to the power PC theory of causal induction depends on the type of probe question.
    Collins DJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 16618631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate step-hold tracking of smoothly varying periodic and aperiodic probability.
    Ricci M; Gallistel R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1480-1494. PubMed ID: 28378283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The probability question in prostatic tissue sampling.
    Hum Pathol; 1987 Feb; 18(2):206. PubMed ID: 3804325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The database search problem: a question of rational decision making.
    Gittelson S; Biedermann A; Bozza S; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):186-99. PubMed ID: 22762949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Permutation tests: precision in estimating probability values.
    Johnston JE; Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):915-20. PubMed ID: 18229545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of differences in gene frequency on probability of paternity.
    Reading PL; Reisner EG
    J Forensic Sci; 1985 Oct; 30(4):1130-9. PubMed ID: 4067539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judging the Probability of Hypotheses Versus the Impact of Evidence: Which Form of Inductive Inference Is More Accurate and Time-Consistent?
    Tentori K; Chater N; Crupi V
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):758-78. PubMed ID: 26100936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.